• RE: Maybe, but I doubt it. Why not stick with Planar??? - mbnx01 10:39:58 02/06/15 (2)
  In Reply to: RE: Maybe, but I doubt it. Why not stick with Planar??? posted by David S. on February 06, 2015 at 07:27:02

  Needs more power than a little tube amp has. By a wide margin.
  
  I'd try either .7's (if there's room) or Ascend Acoustics Sierra-2's (which I've directly compared in my own room to the LS-50).
  
  
  
  
  
  
  "We are all in God's hands... and God is a malign thug."
  
  -Mark Twain
  
  

  ---

  • Where did he say his amp was little? - David S. 10:58:03 02/09/15 (1)
    In Reply to: RE: Maybe, but I doubt it. Why not stick with Planar??? posted by mbnx01 on February 06, 2015 at 10:39:58

    Said he was running MMGs and 1.6s before.
    
    The Mini Maggie surely will be easier to place & drive in a small room, and its tweeter will tend to be much less bright.
    
    

    ---

    • RE: Where did he say his amp was little? - russ69 14:25:47 02/09/15 (0)
      In Reply to: RE: Where did he say his amp was little? posted by David S. on February 09, 2015 at 10:58:03

      The Minis are not a problem but the bass panel is. I already have a twin sub system that works very good in that room and the Maggie bass panel would cause placement issues for me. I'd have to get twin panels and they still might not go low enough to dump my sub set-up. I'd sure like to demo them though.
      

      ---

Post a Followup:

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---