Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
50.132.28.230
In Reply to: RE: Perhaps, the textbooks are wrong. ;-) posted by Swamis Cat on July 28, 2014 at 08:21:40
".....discussion group on how bi-amping destroys the sound by supposedly sending two signals to a shared Mylar."
What do they think the stock, passive crossover does? :)
Sometimes you just have to laugh at the observations made on discussion groups. :)
Dave.
Follow Ups:
Davy (UK) had a listening based observation on coherence going with biamping vs single and found that for him there was something that sounded wrong with the use of different amps on bass and mids on 3.x models. For my own observation it is an issue, but careful matching of amps and XO will solve it and what little time issues remain can be adjusted for by ear with relative distances to the drivers (toe in - on the order of < <1").
Yeah, if you're going to use a disparate combination of amplifiers then that's another variable introduced and not related (directly) to bi-amping.
Yet again you veer off on a tangent from the main topic. You're uncanny in your ability to do this. :) Are you sure you haven't missed your vocation in politics? :)
Dave.
Yes, I tend to veer off, but the point discussed on the peking road planar group is something someone else raised and I just chimed in with my $0.0002 which I had on hand.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: