Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share you ideas and experiences.
Return to Planar Speaker Asylum
67.204.144.51
In Reply to: RE: Hey, if it worked for Acoustat... posted by wazoo on June 29, 2009 at 20:24:07
Do you have a link?
And yes, the fabled 'wankel' three arm deck is up and running, plus I've completed a Technics SL-1200 to a new plinth-I'll send you photos.
"dammit"
The driver change was necessitated by a whoops which damaged a voice coil in one of my REL subs. The JL Audio W3v3 looked like a good replacement driver - good match to the amp and size of the enclosure. After making the swap, I was so stunned that I replaced the driver in the perfectly good sub. This was a very recent change and well worth the money - not much actually. These things ROCK!Post or send me a photo of the TT - I'd love to see it (and congratulations on its completion).
"Jazz is not dead - it just smells funny" FZ
Edits: 07/01/09
Although I lost interest in car audio in the late 90's I remember having a pair of w6's (8") that were surprisingly visceral. I had 2 buddies at the time, one with 2 10" and the other with 2 12" of the same...they dialed them in mainly for impact and man, they sure hit the mark!
How would you rate/compare the performance/musicality (and HT use) of the JL's compared to the stock REL drivers in your setup?
The W6s are dual VC W3s - not much difference otherwise. The JL drivers give up nothing in musicality to the stock drivers in my Q150s - just gave them more oomph. I didn't replace the driver in my Q200 (different system) and I have a dedicated HT sub (an old 15" Klipsch). The 'subs' in my hybrids aren't used as true subwoofers, so I can't answer the HT question (though, I guess I could experiment).
"Jazz is not dead - it just smells funny" FZ
Post a Followup:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2009, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ Go Green ]
[ Take5 ]
