|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
166.137.90.59
In Reply to: RE: Reality On The Subject posted by Inmate51 on December 08, 2016 at 07:30:44
...but you already knew that. And yeah, little faux pas like calling sodium a mineral or crude language do little to lend credibility to the OP's generally contrarian assertions even if based on decades of research.
Follow Ups:
Definition #5 of mineral from dictionary.com
"5.
Nutrition. any of the inorganic elements, as calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium, or sodium, that are essential to the functioning of the human body and are obtained from foods." These metals are commonly referred to as minerals and I don't see this as a JURB faux pas. It's much of everything else he said in his ridiculous diatribe that is substantially or completely incorrect, depending of how one would define this level of incorrectness. T456
" Knowledge is a deadly friend
If no one sets the rules.
The fate of all mankind I see
Is in the hands of fools." From the pen of the Crimson King
...I remain suspicious of JURB 's claims.
Regardless of "dictionary.com", sodium is not a mineral, it is a corrosive elemental metal. The fact that we need sodium in order to function is another topic.
We do not ingest sodium in its elemental form, we ingest it as a component of a mineral. This is clear.
:)
I'm done.
Maybe I'll just delete all my text and let this rest, forever. I know nothing.
...but every field of specialization has its jargon or lexicon. I find this specific usage imprecise and wouldn't use it in the scholarly literature for that reason. But who am I to judge? Oops, I guess I just did.
Yeah, it's kinda like "recording engineer" even when the person has no science or engineering degree or even a modicum of engineering education. It's a slang and incorrect usage of the term.
Sodium is NOT a mineral, even if some people wish to loosely call it one. Nutritionists are actually referring to it within the context of it being a part of a mineral composition, such as salt. As long as everyone in the conversation and the audience understand that, I suppose that's ok. But when a person who professes to have "researched" a topic comes along and says flat out "sodium is a mineral", their believability goes right out the window.
I don't put much stock in downstream "definitions" (in this case, definition #5) with online "dictionaries" except as casual usage. I much prefer hardcore dictionaries such as Britannica and Webster. While they both have online versions, and that's good, there are other "me too" online dictionaries which tend toward too much "fluff".
:)
...Sodium (Na) is an element, sodium chloride ("salt", NaCl) is a compound and maybe a "mineral", halite is a mineral.
Still, I like being called an audio "engineer". It gives me a little respect.
:)
"...I remain suspicious of JURB's claims. "
By all means, question EVERYTHING.
For good reason.
" Knowledge is a deadly friend
If no one sets the rules.
The fate of all mankind I see
Is in the hands of fools." From the pen of the Crimson King
:)Yeah, it's pretty hard to put much stock into what someone writes when they can't even spit out a sentence without multiple pertinent mistakes.
Anyway, it'd be nice if he'd include four or five references from his "decades of research".
:)
Edits: 12/08/16
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: