|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
74.42.178.231
In Reply to: RE: I don't think laughing it off is proof, but I think an experienced QB certainly could tell, if he were posted by tinear on January 21, 2015 at 11:23:56
I guess you have no clue that each team provides it's own balls. The refs caught on when Brady was intercepted and the player that caught it told the refs that the ball was funny.
Follow Ups:
on purpose since under thrown balls are most easily picked off. I could see trying to get the other team to use one, but they'd notice…
Strange situation.
Belichick and Brady will go down as the greatest combo in the sport's history, though, like Clinton, the dark underbelly will color the legacy.
supposedly underinflated balls are easier to grip for both the passing game and the running game. NOw if they had a combination of both.....
had taken the ball to Pagano and he had called a time out to show the football to a ref. Imagine the refs checking the Pats footballs during the game and finding all of them under-inflated.
in 1993. They measured the stick curvature during the game, accessed the Kings a minor penalty --- which ultimately lead to tying goal. And eventual lost of the Cup.I agree. There should be some sort of appropriate penalty accessed during the game if nearly all of the footballs on one side is out-of-spec. Fining the Pats, or accessing a draft pick penalty doesn't do the Colts any good.
Edits: 01/21/15
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: