|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
174.68.76.189
In Reply to: RE: New CA college sex law, "Yes means yes!" posted by tinear on September 29, 2014 at 07:53:33
Tin,
What you DON'T know about Prop13 would and HAS filled several books. If it wern't for prop 13, the tax-and-spenders would continue to raise valuations and basically run fixed-income types OUT of there homes. That was perhaps the main reason for Prop13 in the first place. Stability has a value all its own. Ever increasing property COSTS with little actual value increase due to inflation feeds a 'churn' of sales/purchases of homes since fixed incomes rarely keep pace with inflation.
As for the NEW law, I suspect that ONE reasonable defense would be to get the 'partner' to sign a 'sex release' stating: 1. No Duress 2. Sober 3. Informed Consent 4. Limits of Post Coital Responsibility.
Any reasonable attorney should be able to wrap that up in 5 or 6 single spaced pages. As a matter of FACT, I'll take credit RIGHT NOW for the coming App (no pun intended) which will be on a smart device Near You within a matter of a few weeks.
Too much is never enough
Follow Ups:
...the single largest beneficiary of Prop. 13 was the Chevron Corp. in Richmond, CA.
I can understand wanting little old ladies to be able to live in their houses but what is the justification for including business property?
Or perhaps the better question is who bankrolled the ballot measure?
One other point:
You drag Chevron into this:
OK, no problem. It would appear that 'the jury is still out' on this one, as Chevron just got quite the additional tax bill.
The city of Richmond apparently left quite a bundle on the table by NOT trying to sue. The Superior Court may have sided with, and probably WOULD have sided with Richmond and it'd have cost Chevron a LOT.
Here's the link to what I hope is a reasonably fair presentation of the facts and history:
Too much is never enough
That's what you get when corporations are given legal 'personhood'. Maybe we as a society should rethink that.
The corrupting influence of corporate money is obvious.
Too much is never enough
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: