|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.66.39.142
In Reply to: RE: Hilarious..... posted by unclestu on May 20, 2011 at 12:54:14
Nope, never said it. You're just a big fat liar, one who doesn't even know what the piezoelectric effect is.
Follow Ups:
You can still be a "rocket scientist" and a "theoretical [physicist" in your own mind.
And just where did you ever get the idea that ionizing a CD player and LP improved the sound?
LOL!
Stu
Acoustic Revive has a product Ionizing cd's using tourmaline, some other companies are selling similar products
There's also the Tourmaline Gun from Xtreme AV, Furutech's Static Charge Eliminator (ionizer), and Mapleshade's Ionoclast. Not to mention the plethora of commercial room ionizers that have been suggested on these pages. I won't begin to address the raft of other anti-static treatments for CDs, including Nordost anti-static spray and all the myriad CD liquids and gels most of which contain an anti-static agents in addition to mold release compound agents, optical cleaners, optical enhancers, etc.
Edits: 05/21/11
Just can't shake that steelworker inferiority complex, eh? So, you're sticking to your ridiculous theory of negative ions freeing up extra electrons? I guess steelworkers just don't know when to give up.
"And just where did you ever get the idea that ionizing a CD player and LP improved the sound?"
Have you been living in cave?
I attribute the effects on CD and LP to degaussing.
Stu
"obviously not in the cave you live in"
See what I mean? You're using my material again, get your own material.
"I attribute the effects on CD and LP to degaussing."
That's why you're the steelworker and I'm the theroetical physicist.
a bit sensitive, aren't we. I believe your argument, that you are a theoretical physicist, is an appeal to authority. Classic argument but one not borne out by any proof from you.
At least I have a theory, not necessarily mine, but one which is borne out by experimentation. We are still awaiting proof of the time shift created by your clock, BTW, and a handy explanation of how with one clock and no adjustments you correct time shifts from recordings made over century apart.
Now as I said before, a lucid explanation,ought to garner you a Nobel Prize.
Somehow I doubt if that will occur.
At any rate, attempting to get any lucid explanation from you is pretty impossible. so in the future I believe I will ignore your posts unless you really have a contribution to make. Trying to forward the science
from a guy who can only claim to be a rocket scientist and a theoretical physicist and has nothing else to contribute is a waste of my time, and mind you, that's coming from a dummy blue collar worker.
LOL
stu
The accusation of Appeal to Authority is not very relevant when the person making the claim actually is knowledgeable or perhaps considered an expert in the area under discussion. Of course, even experts in a given field can disagree, that's why arguments can sometimes go on forever. A more accurate example of Appeal to Authority would be if Arthur C. Clarke, an expert on satellite communications, offered his explanation for why birds migrate. See the difference?While you were apparently sleeping I published the explanation for how the clock works last year on my web site. What, you haven't read it?! A Nobel Prize sounds yummy. And, yes, the explanation accounts for records produced 100 years ago.
"Trying to forward the science from a guy who can only claim to be a rocket scientist and a theoretical physicist and has nothing else to contribute is a waste of my time, and mind you, that's coming from a dummy blue collar worker."
Yes, a frustrated dummy blue collar worker. LOL
Edits: 05/23/11 05/23/11
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: