Audio Asylum Thread Printer

Get a view of an entire thread on one page

Isolation Ward

RE: Well now - that's an original argument

98.203.126.133

In Reply to: RE: Well now - that's an original argument posted by groove on February 04, 2008 at 17:43:01

Just because someone is scientifically inclined, doesn't mean they have to make a concerted effort to save/change the world. Hell, plenty of scientific breakthroughs were laboratory accidents.

My company sells a soil-based probiotic- Pet Flora. It is extraordinarily effective at resolving GI imbalance and a cornerstone to health of an individual or pet. Pet Flora is available today as a result of a research scientist observing dogs eating grass some 15 years ago. Upon careful examination, he found the dogs were pulling at the grass to get at the soil-based probiotic organisms, which as it turns out, is the primary reason why they eat grass- not the grass itself!

Ever heard of cross pollination? Who is to say what impact Teleportation might have on someone specializing in the field of hearing impairment? I can't recall who, but many yers ago I read where someone in hi-end manufacture was working on hearing aids. Lots in common there, don't you think?

Follow Ups:

"I read where someone in hi-end manufacture was working on hearing aids." LOL! - clarkjohnsen 11:41:57 02/05/08 (0)
That was Thomas Edison! Ever hear his Diamond Discs? They were the best records then!

"Plenty of scientific breakthroughs were laboratory accidents." Yes, serendipity. The whole phenomenon upsets those with conventional views of "scientific research", so they rarely mention it.

clark
Cross Pollination - fine - groove 09:39:04 02/05/08 (0)
Scientifically inclined and Einstein are two TOTALLY different sports – much less even being in the same ball park. The "look at Einstein. Pasteur, etc, etc” example is incredibly unimaginative and equally ineffective. That is my point – at least try and come up with a well balanced and grounded position that can be discussed in a manner that at least provokes thought. Invoking the great names of science as a position of justification for the TT theories is at best weak and really just says there is not much other substance.

My point is simply – COME UP WITH A NEW ARGUMENT ALREADY! At least try and make people think!

No matter how much you may want it to happen – new science is not being generated within HiEnd audio. New circuit designs, new cap designs, new wire designs, absolutely! Our fundamental understanding of how atoms function – absolutely not! One is taking existing science and further improving upon current applications through DESIGN improvements. The other is fundamentally changing our understanding of the way the world works!
RE: Well now - that's an original argument - May Belt 03:10:09 02/05/08 (1)
> > > "I can't recall who, but many yers ago I read where someone in hi-end manufacture was working on hearing aids. Lots in common there, don't you think?" < < <

THAT would be May and Peter Belt !!!! In 1985 - 22 years ago !!

Peter working on the technique and May working with the ENT consultant and his chief technician at one of the UK's leading teaching hospitals !!!

Regards,
May Belt.
- Interesting... nt - clarkjohnsen 11:43:27 02/05/08 (0)
  a

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.