|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.22.235.48
In Reply to: RE: Pioneer PAX-30g posted by goldjazz on January 21, 2015 at 02:06:20
http://audio-database.com/PIONEER-EXCLUSIVE/unit/pax-30g-e.html
Follow Ups:
I might buy that 103dB at 1/2M, but never at 1M.
Pyle used to publish their graphs for 1/2W at 1/2M, you just had to read the fine print(and subtract 3dB).
Not sure if this helps
It doesn't disclose the test method.
Edits: 01/23/15
Have you tested them or is there evidence to the contrary? What is your basis for disputing the spec. and why is it more accurate? I am not trying to be confrontational but when a person makes a flat statement as a fact as you did, I like to see the evidence behind the statement. I agree most speaker specs. are subject to challenge as they are almost a subjective decision based on some measurement that can be broadly interpreted.
Don Brian Levy, J.D.
Toronto ON Canada
When pigs fly?
The most efficient permanent magnet 15" driver ever made was the JBL 130/2220 series driver at No=8.7%, or 101.4dB
Now while it will produce some ragged peaks in the upper midrange that are higher, would it be truthful to advertize it as being higher in efficiency that it actually is in its piston band (the octave between its EBP and Mass Corner)?
Eminence makes some 12" guitar speakers that are over 110dB above 2Khz, but are, at best, 98dB in their piston band.
Thus, when I see a permanent magnet 12" driver claiming 103dB I know it isn't so.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: