High Efficiency Speaker Asylum

Posted by cpbajan (D) on October 31, 2009 at 06:47:20

In Reply to: RE: Compression driver, or cone speakers for midbass horns - what is better ? posted by PK on October 31, 2009 at 04:46:01

Whick conical horn did you use the P audio 5.25 driver with, and what range did it cover.

• RE: Compression driver, or cone speakers for midbass horns - what is better ? - PK 07:55:07 10/31/09 (2)
  In Reply to: RE: Compression driver, or cone speakers for midbass horns - what is better ? posted by cpbajan on October 31, 2009 at 06:47:20

  
  
  

  
  Hi cpbajan,
  
  The mid horn is a custom made, 61.5 cm long, conical horn with a 60 degree horizontal dispersion. With the PAudio driver it covers the 260-1500 Hz range.
  
  Best regards
  Peter
  

  ---

  • RE: Compression driver, or cone speakers for midbass horns - what is better ? - cpbajan 11:25:23 10/31/09 (0)
    In Reply to: RE: Compression driver, or cone speakers for midbass horns - what is better ? posted by PK on October 31, 2009 at 07:55:07

    Thank you Peter for the infomation. Always looking to gain more information about horn implimentation
    

    ---
  • PAudio WN-520N - specs - PK 08:08:23 10/31/09 (0)
    In Reply to: RE: Compression driver, or cone speakers for midbass horns - what is better ? posted by PK on October 31, 2009 at 07:55:07

    Here are the specs of the little Paudio "monster"!
    
    Best regards
    Peter

    • Paudio WN-520N   (Open in New Window)

    
    

    ---

Post a Followup:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ High Efficiency Speaker Asylum ]
[ Comment ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2009, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ] [ Go Green ] [ Take5 ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---