Hi-Rez Highway

Need some Time Out big time!

220.255.1.27

jeromelang

A

In Reply to: RE: Time Out posted by Jazz Inmate on July 14, 2012 at 08:11:25

I REALLY NEED TO STOP BUYING!

1999 two-channel single layer
1999 two-channel JSACD
2000 multichannel version
2012 multichannel/hybrid APO SACD

I really wish you haven't mentioned the 2002 stereo jsacd, now I'll get sleepless nights until I hunt down that copy to complete my collection......, especially after I discovered that the stereo layer on the 2000 m-ch disc isn't as bad as I remember it sound that many years ago. It is really quite good after I had given it a few spin (something that will blow away the stinky static...)

Time out! Time out!

Got the 6 eye mono and stereo LP somewhere too. Trouble is I don't know where I chucked them :-)

Follow Ups:

RE: Need some Time Out big time! - tullmna 09:18:32 07/19/12 (2)
I really like Time Out, but do I need to buy this one anymore. I have the SACD and other Cd versions. I have the Classic Records 45rpm vinyl and a few other vinyl versions. They all sound good.

You know, Dave Brubeck has other great titles out there why not release some of those on SACD.
- "You know, Dave Brubeck has other great titles out there why not release some of those on SACD." - Jazz Inmate 16:22:10 07/19/12 (0)
  Do you have Jazz at Oberlin? One of his best on SACD.
  -------------
  
  We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
  - Brubeck jazz at Oberlin SACD (Open in New Window)
- RE: Need some Time Out big time! - jeromelang 09:25:49 07/19/12 (0)
  Each disc has a different sound.
  It's nice to be able to compare and learn about how each disc media and mastering practices affect the sound.
  It's all in the fun about this hobby.
You need a decent camera - Metralla 18:46:23 07/18/12 (7)
what a crappy photo.

Regards,
Geoff
- Yeah. Blame it on the iPad. - jeromelang 01:21:15 07/19/12 (6)
  Here's one done with a Samsung phone.
  It's not that much better either.
  Must be my photography skills......! :-)
  - Well, that's clearer - Metralla 05:28:18 07/19/12 (5)
    Surprised at how bad the iPad photo was in poor light.
    
    Regards,
    Geoff
    - RE: Well, that's clearer - dodgy2 08:13:50 07/19/12 (4)
      Latest gen Touch has crappy camera too. Convenience increasingly matters more than quality, otherwise folks would have a quality standalone digital SLR, but after blowing all the green on sacd and gear to play it on - the cheap-o camera must do.
      - Don't let my lack of photography skills puts you off - jeromelang 09:21:57 07/19/12 (3)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Well, that's clearer posted by dodgy2 on July 19, 2012 at 08:13:50
        
        I'm sure some guys can make better pictures than I can on the iPad and the Samsung hand phone. Posting a photo via either of these 2 devices is certainly more handy than having to extract the storage card out from the standalone camera, powering up the pc and uploading the photo onto the web. I find myself using the pc less and less. I'm surfing, downloading a movie, and making this post, all just through the iPad, and while listening to music and don't have to worry about batteries running out within a couple of hours. That's nice thing to have on a cool, rainy night.
        
        Convenience versus quality - Metralla 15:57:41 07/19/12 (2)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Don't let my lack of photography skills puts you off posted by jeromelang on July 19, 2012 at 09:21:57
        
        It's convenient for you, but why foist it on us?
        
        We are the audience - if you treat us like shit by throwing up a crappy photo when you could take a little longer, make an effort, and post a good photo, then you lose our respect.
        
        How convenient is that?
        
        Regards,
        Geoff
        
        RE: Convenience versus quality - Jazz Inmate 20:04:44 07/19/12 (1)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Convenience versus quality posted by Metralla on July 19, 2012 at 15:57:41
        
        The pic was fine. We all know what an SACD and JSACD look like in real life, why do you need a nice photo of it when the only real purpose is just to show which versions are in his collection. This isn't a photography forum, it's an sacd forum.
        -------------
        
        We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
        
        RE: Convenience versus quality - Robert C. Lang 21:44:01 07/19/12 (0)
        
        In Reply to: RE: Convenience versus quality posted by Jazz Inmate on July 19, 2012 at 20:04:44
        
        Agreed. While I certainly noticed the graininess I didn't think anything about. It didn't interfere with the message of the post.
        
        Robert C. Lang
So how does the APO stack up? - Jazz Inmate 18:39:03 07/18/12 (1)
I really don't want to have to get it, but if it sounds that much better than my domestic mch.
-------------

We must be the change we wish to see in the world. -Gandhi
- It doesn't. - jeromelang 01:05:20 07/19/12 (0)
  But the rule of the game is you should have to buy it to find out for yourself why....

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Parts Connexion