 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
75.0.6.30
In Reply to: RE: Since you are so fond of repeating yourself, let me indulge too........ posted by navman on March 23, 2009 at 13:50:10
As I said before this is not rocket science, surely you are not as dumb as you pretend to be. Just look again at what it says at the top of the page, surely you are not blind? Maybe you just don't pay attention?
LOOK AGAIN AT THE TOP OF THE SCREEN IN YOU ENTRANCE TO THE HI-REZ HIGHWAY, Here is what it says:
Hi-Rez Highway
New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.
There are other areas of the audio asylum for other forms of high resolution:
DVD-Audiobahn
New DVD-Audio music releases and talk about the latest players.
Computer Audio Asylum
Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies.
Vinyl Asylum
Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers!
Why do I have to baby sit you? Isn't it time you grow up?
You said "The DVD-A forum was created because of trolls like you and KEKL."
This is a bald face lie, the spilt was caused because the SACD supporters and the DVD-Audio supporters couldn't get along.
I have never been a troll. And it would be impossible for me to troll on the Hi-Rez highway because I am a very stanch supporter of the SACD format. The only way I could troll is if I took my high resolution SACD feelings and posted on Digital Drive. I REFUSE TO DO THAT BECAUSE I DO NOT BELIEVE IN TROLLING.
You on the other hand are a KNOWN troll on the Hi-Rez highway and you are on my list of the 10 worst offensive trolls.
Give me high resolution or remain silent,
Teresa
Follow Ups:
Sheesh.
Your posts are actually too repetitive.
I dont care what you think of me. I see you as a troll. A propagandist.
Some say you have a passion for SACD. There are some people on these forums who are passionate about the sound of SACD.
You on the other hand border on something very strange indeed.
As if your life was dependent on it.
CDs will never be marketed as hybrids.
SACDs will never become a popular medium.
And your have researched and half baked ideas on physics and psycho-acoustics impress very few indeed.
You just go on and on ad nauseum.
Sad really.
Actually you and Kekel were major losers ripping at each other. The rest did fairly well over the long run.
As I have said many times, you have created discontent on many forums with your silly, opinionated posts.
The Vinyl forum is a good example. You kept trolling about SACDs till you had people telling you to get lost.
Your posts either over value other posters or ridicules them.. Nothing in between. Thats not honesty. That is immaturity.
Over the years you put people down, ridicule then and patronize them.
And then you're surprised that you get a harsh response, or people don't take you seriously.
I agree with some things you say. Many things I disagree with.
SACD is better than RBCD.
Upsampling cannot recreate information lost.
Everything else you post is nonsense. Some is opinion, yes, but a lot is just babbling thrash.
I say, you are a troll. You haunt whatever forum you are on, an like the attention you get with your silly, pointless, offensive comments.
navman
You seem to have no reading ability or reading comprehension. You can't even retain what the Hi-Rez Highway is, even though it says what it is PLAIN AS DAY at the page when you enter the forum. "Hi-Rez Highway - New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology." I am getting tired of posting this again and again, when will it seep into your brain? All you have to do is look at the upper right hand side of the page when you enter the "Hi-Rez Highway" and read!That was a good picture of you Mr. Troll. As I have said I have never trolled in my entire life. On the other hand you troll daily.
I am glad to see you agree with
SACD is better than RBCD.
Upsampling cannot recreate information lost.
At least that is a start, and I don't require you agree with everything I say, no writer can expect that.Nothing in my writing is nonsense as you claim, as I research and try to be as correct as possible in the presentation of both facts and opinions. A lot of work goes into my writings and even just everyday posts.
I don't make silly, pointless, or offensive comments as you claim. I try to stay on topic and am usually the one correcting someone else's misstatements or misunderstandings. Or defending posters unjustly under attack by CD Trolls such as yourself. In fact it is the Trolls who make offensive comments when they are losing some stupid discussion over something they said that even they know could not be true.
If you are referring to my wanting the Hi-Rez HIghway to actually be about SACD software and hardware there is nothing silly, pointless, offensive about that unless of course one is a troll such as yourself. I really wish you would go troll somewhere else as I am tired of you attacking me, Hiro and now MC-SACDs. Why do you do this?
The funniest thing of all is you pretend not to know what an SACD/CD hybrid is? And why it is so important as the eventual replacement of the ancient single layer CD format of the 1980's, which will eventually disappear as it is not versatile enough. The CD layer on SACD hybrids is there for a reason and the reason is transition. How could you have read thousands of posts on the Hi-Rez highway and not know that? I wouldn't give up on SACD never becoming a popular medium just yet, the best is yet to come! Of course this is only my opinion.
You are wrong about CDs never being marketed as hybrids, I just awarded two companies my "Dedicated SACD Hybrid Revolution" Award for recording all new projects in DSD and releasing only single inventory SACD/CD hybrids. (see link)
Give me high resolution or remain silent,
Teresa
Edits: 03/24/09
5.6MKz DSD encoding is available, so why be saddled with inferior 2.6MKz SACD's. I myself, utilize 5.6MKz for achieving.
So you really prefer the inferior sound of DSD recordings done at only half of the DSD rate?
This just proves that SACD’s are old technology. Isn't it time you saddle up your horse and take on Sony to release HD-SACD to take advantage to the higher resolution?
since it was first announced in 2004.
BluRay is PCM not DSD, if Sony had went with Dr. Yoshio Yamasaki’s Super DVD format I would say yes.
Posted by Teresa (R ) on February 26, 2009 at 13:36:37
http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.mpl?forum=hirez&n=254038
RE: One may have to wonder what SACD brings to the table that Blu-ray cannot provide.
Posted by Teresa (R ) on September 22, 2008 at 18:46:57
http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.mpl?forum=hirez&n=248720
You are correct I will not support either to of the major contenders, I support DSD Video via Super DVD
Posted by Teresa on August 21, 2004 at 16:38:38
http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.mpl?forum=hirez&n=186473
Actually it's Super DVD offering both HD Video and DSD Audio that will replace DVD
Posted by Teresa on August 19, 2004 at 21:00:19
http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.mpl?forum=hirez&n=186275
I'm glad 5.6MKz DSD encoding is working out so great for your vinyl archiving.
Give me high resolution or remain silent,
Teresa
But I believe that went "whoosh" above her head.
navman
Yes it is.
Well a couple of points I agree with.
The rest is rubbish.
navman
Post a Followup:
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2013, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ Take5 ]
