![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Was it the software, or... posted by racerguy on December 25, 2003 at 10:18:39:
my player is a SA-14. I know its red book is not up to the level of its SACD performance but it does not totally suck either. The rest of my system/room is definitely way better than the SA-14 so any differences to be heard are readily apparent the good and the bad. I had a Teac DV-50 in the system for a day with some friends and my general impression between CD and SACD still would apply there as well.I have also noticed over the years that different people hear different things in different ways and respond accordingly. What stands out for one person is a wash for another. As an example a bud and I were listening to an external dac a few weeks ago on the system and he liked what he heard and decribed the presentation as cozy and warm. I did not get that impresssion at all. I found the DAC rolled off and very flat sounding with no dynamics. Go figure ?? I have also noticed that some guys tend to build systems that make all recordings sound similar or shall I use the word pleasing and in the process their system can not clearly show the differences between formats or recordings.
I have listened to top notch (hyper expensive Levinson, Wadia, Theta Digital)red book performance on various occassions for hours at a time and I have yet to hear what SACD does on such a regular and effortless basis. I know having a better red book player would tighten the gap in certain areas of performance but I do not think it can make up for a format which just does not have the data in the bits to begin with.
One of my next upgrades I want to entertain is a better front end to bring it in line with the rest of the system but I still do not see a all in one player (CD/SACD) that is substantially better than the SA-14 to justify the 5-8K investment at this point. Maybe in a year or two when more quality universal players start to become the norm I hope.
![]()
Follow Ups:
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: