|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
65.19.73.221
In Reply to: RE: MQA questions posted by Todd Krieger on January 17, 2016 at 01:16:20
No, you understand incorrectly. MQA is not lossless. It is a lossy system. However, the "loss" starts from a higher than CD resolution. The claim is to get all of the "audible" benefits of true high resolution audio while using only slightly more bandwidth an a basic CD.
Of course, all digital formats are "lossy" when compared against an original analog signal. A FLAC version of a WAV file may losslessly reproduce WAV file, but neither version can represent the analog original perfectly.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
Follow Ups:
a solution to a problem that will disappear over time as bandwidths increase around the globe. Why bother getting involved with yet another proprietary format, of questionable advantage?
Big J
"... only a very few individuals understand as yet that personal salvation is a contradiction in terms."
MQA is a 21st century Dynagroove. (I guess this dates me.)
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: