|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.130.117.241
In Reply to: RE: More proof of activity on the quantum level.... posted by alan m. kafton on July 18, 2015 at 21:32:58
EMF and LCR are all aspects of quantum behavior. An electron is a quantum particle.
Those who elect to keep their minds and head buried in the sand will argue against quantum effects, but they do so out their own ignorance
Follow Ups:
... Don't pretend to understand them. Folks around here who offer "quantum effects" as an explanation of audiophile effects don't actually understand them either.
Until you can explain exactly how "quantum effects" improves the sound of your whatever, (say cables), you are selling snake oil.
I love the music of Dmitri Shostakovich
What if a relationship is shown to exist between and intervention and an out come, even if the mechanism is not easily understood?
How strong would the evidence suggesting said relationship need to be for the intervention to be considered plausible, or worthy of further investigation, or causal (mildly, moderately, strongly)... considering that the means of the quantification may not yet exist (let alone how it might map to practical use) and qualification can be readily confounded by context and the methods of investigation... and subjectivity?
Just wonderin'.
Regards,
91
"Confusion of goals and perfection of means seems to characterise our age." Albert Einstein
Just because you post a hypothetical to the internet does not mean you have posted evidence of anything, much less demonstrated the straw man assumed in your hypothetical.
JE
I think you may have missed my point due to some semantic confusion.It is clear from the thread we are conversing in generalities, not scientific nomenclature. If you missed that or are capable only of literal interpretation, speaking in nomenclature and one-step-logic please substitute for the term "evidence" either "argument" or "finding" or "proposition" or some other relevant lay-term. Hopefully this clarifies the point and minimises any confusion.
Regards,
91.
"Confusion of goals and perfection of means seems to characterise our age." Albert Einstein
Edits: 07/21/15
It sure does! You're just talking out of your ass then, aren't you?
JE
.
...because although I recognise that the relationships can be difficult to prove, I also understand that this can leave the door open for the unscrupulous to take advantage of people (i.e. there is little burden of proof).
Cheers,
91.
"Confusion of goals and perfection of means seems to characterise our age." Albert Einstein
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: