|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
108.249.169.177
In Reply to: RE: What are you on about, luv? posted by rlw on May 04, 2015 at 08:50:49
I think he was being sarcastic
Alan
Follow Ups:
He does have a point, though. In some respects, the cassette format is superior to 44/16 digital. It is a matter of personal preference as to which is better, albeit neither has "perfect sound". When it comes to "forever" the CD has a huge edge, however.
I have digitally remastered many cassette tape dubbing masters and rarely have I found it possible to transparently reproduce the sound off my Nak CR-7a while using the 44/16 format. No problem at 192/24 however...
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
Hi maybe 16/48 is enough. In the end is the format selected for DAT recording by professionals.
I think that the difference from 44.1 to 48 is remarkable.
When i listened for the 1st time a dvd movie soundtrack in 16/48 i heard more music than with CD.
I think that a 48kHz recording can give a better high frequencies reproduction.
If the CD were 16/48 the world would be a better place ... less unsatisfaction.
Kind regards,
bg
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: