|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
80.218.199.14
In Reply to: RE: They said it couldn't be done: a budget system in the mid-fi price range..... posted by wangmr on March 27, 2015 at 08:53:19
Never heard of the stuff. Is it cheap chinese crap? How do you know the gear is mid-fi in sound? If you don't or cannot verify the sonic quality then it might not even be worth the moderate asking price. Once you add a source and cables it is priced in a range that non-audiophiles would simply call "expensive".
Follow Ups:
.
Do NOT reply to this message
Your email to wangmr has been sent. Your message was as follows:
Audio Asylum Email from The Bored:
> > thanks for advertising your answer and our correspondence
You're welcome. That's how it has to be when you communicate from an email address that does not function properly.
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: wangmr@hush.com
Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain hush.com by mx6.hushmail.com. [65.39.178.135].
The error that the other server returned was: 550 5.1.1 wangmr@hush.com: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
> > how many more times do you want the Audio Asylum world to see your directive and threat of termination.
As many times as you choose to communicate from an email address that does not function properly?
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: wangmr@hush.com
Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain hush.com by mx6.hushmail.com. [65.39.178.135].
The error that the other server returned was: 550 5.1.1 wangmr@hush.com: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
> > care to post your answer a *third* time????
Sure.
> > why not?
Can't think of a good reason. Why not use a real email return address? Can't you see your part in this? Of course not. Just like you can't see why you brought the ire of others upon you.
> > you know i saw your answer the first time - i wrote you immediately right away afterwards.
Yes, NOW we know. But we were not able to respond to you directly. You know why? Because you communicate from an email address that does not function properly.
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: wangmr@hush.com
Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain hush.com by mx6.hushmail.com. [65.39.178.135].
The error that the other server returned was: 550 5.1.1 wangmr@hush.com: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table
Consequently, we'll be ignoring your future emails.
Fax mentis incendium gloria cultum, et cetera, et cetera...
Memo bis punitor delicatum! It's all there, black and white,
clear as crystal! Blah, blah, and so on and so forth ...
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: