|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
107.205.10.55
In Reply to: RE: An interesting read posted by middleground on November 13, 2014 at 11:38:07
...any grad student can do a well-researched long-winded paper on practically anything to support their own opinion.
Probably any high school debater today...
No doubt you posted it because it supports yours.
Follow Ups:
She has the audiophile subculture down to a T.
Kelly Heward's research showed that "masculinity, elitism, and knowledge about sound" have long been characteristic of audiophile subculture.
I was fascinated to see how petty Harry Pearson could be in analog vs. digital controversies in the early 1980s and how snarky he could be with letter writers. J. Gordon Holt in the same period could be petty, too, but generally was more equable. I'm glad I never knew either one of them.
I don't know what audio point of view you see in there.
-----
"A fool and his money are soon parted." --- Thomas Tusser
> I was fascinated to see how petty Harry Pearson could be in analog vs. digital controversies in the early 1980s...>
Harry was right - early digital sucked and he was one of the few to take a stand.
Today analogue is still marginally better at reproducing and communicating music.
"A fool and his money are soon partying."
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: