|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
50.158.103.4
Talking Pono. There may be a video of the actual interview vs the short from today.
Edits: 10/14/14Follow Ups:
Fitting title- Uncle Neil should have 'mad money' after this whole thing takes off...
d
x
"one of the greatest musicians alive"... 'nuff said.
That commentator is just ignorant.
I think that the commentator meant 'musical artist' and I agree with him. Although past his prime, Neil Young's body of work speaks for itself. It's quite a creative achievement which few can rival. At least the ones still breathing.
I wonder is Joni Mitchell still alive?
She's right up there in my estimation, along with a handful of others such as Dylan and McCartney (at least in rock anyway).
Thank you. It needed to be said.
"We are all in God's hands... and God is a malign thug."
-Mark Twain
"The BSR turntable, the Pickering stylus..."
GMAFB! Now Cramer is an audiophile? Even as a kid I knew that BSR and Pickering were, at best, low end mid-fi. I had better stuff when I was 11...
-RW-
I actually did have a BSR and BSR speakers when I was 13. Sold the equalizer this week! Still have the speakers. 15" woofers. Fun for a 13 year old... and apparently Neil Young.
Kerry
I thought Mr. Kramer did a really good job describing the PONO in layman's terms in the limited time he was allotted in the segment.
"It's like a long distance call versus a face to face conversation, the difference is that great". Well stated Mr. Kramer.
In cars by 2016 - great!
There will be a few pissed audiophiles because they don't want "regular people" in their hobby. I guess they will have to find another hobby dominated by dorks - model railroading perhaps.
The sooner we can get rid of mp3 and 16/44.1 in favor of higher rez formats, the better.
I was a vegetarian for 15 minutes, until the main course.......Meat; It's the right thing to do. Romans 14:2
Not that I care about people using mp3 there's plenty of alternatives available for me.
The problem IMO with 2 channel folks as they've been trained to believe that better sound is going to cost more money. Huh, there's a revolution in sound quality happening at lower price points. Other than moving to higher rez formats the "high end" offers little real for the general public to get excited about except the pride of ownership of beautiful and/or expensive audio systems. Nothing wrong with that.
I could be wrong but is it possible that a device like the pono, or some other quality portable DAP when connected to a DAC and fed to high quality powered speakers could compete sonically with 10s of thousands of dollars in front end gear?
Given quality recordings there really isn't any reason why not.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
/
long live dorks!
Agreed.
99% on this forum are at least somewhat of a "dork", the other 1% are deluded.
Dorks - making others look cool since the dawn of time.
I was a vegetarian for 15 minutes, until the main course.......Meat; It's the right thing to do. Romans 14:2
/
Need to get out more, if you are using mp3 and 16/44.1 in the same sentence.
Not that much wrong with 16/44.1 as a format. Mostly just shortcomings in recording and playback technology.
One format (mp3) sucks ass, the other (16/44.1) sucks slightly less......
To paraphrase Paul McGowan of PS Audio fame; Great digital struggles to achieve what is easily attainable by even modest analog.
PS Audio puts beans on the table with their digital offerings.
I was a vegetarian for 15 minutes, until the main course.......Meat; It's the right thing to do. Romans 14:2
Hi, geezerrocket,
In my experience, the relative sound quality of MP3 compared to redbook CD (16/44.1) is far more of a difference than "sucks slightly less". I am able to enjoy music played from CDs, nearly as much as from LPs, but I cannot listen to music played from MP3 quality files. The sound hurts my brain and I can usually immediately tell that I'm listening to lossy digital files. (The exception is if the playback device is basically a cheap piece-o-crap and anything played on it would hurt your ears.)
You might be able to make your case if CDs were universally badly recorded and mastered, but the sound quality from many modern CDs is quite good, especially if played on a relatively decent system. Perhaps you're just very sensitive to 16/44.1 resolution. If so, that's unfortunate, because you're missing out on a lot of great music.
Regards,
Tom
stacks up against Audio Note or DCS 16/44.1.
The price difference is huge.
Too big for me!
Those rooms NOT exclusively playing vinyl, and many were, were either playing directly from a computer of some sort and/or spinning silver disks.
I'd say over half of the rooms would willingly play just about any CD you brought into the room and most of those were 16/44.1 Redbook CDs.
In fact, many rooms playing music from files of one sort or another would announce that what you were hearing was ripped CD's not Hi Rez.
In a much longer and more far-ranging interview, the topic of sound quality came up and Tom Petty spoke very positively about Pono.
But Mad Money? First Darryl Hannah and now Jim Cramer.
Darryl Hannah is past her expiration date. The last time she was hot is when she played Bud Foxx's girlfriend in Wall street.
Honest comments like yours make me think of some ugly as sin dude sitting with a box of Kleenex while watching skin flicks and reading porno zines. How close am I?
Maybe I'm too old but if I were single I'd think she, and Hilary Clinton for that matter, would be awesome women to be involved with. But that's just me - needy women no matter how attractive turn me off.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
Hilary Clinton? What are you smoking goober Pyle? What's next, aunt bee.
Aint Bee, not me, she ain't got any money.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
Can we stream too or just a portable service? I can't hear the interview, it is too loud in here!
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: