|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.232.224.41
In Reply to: RE: Thanks for posting this... posted by mkuller on April 07, 2014 at 15:00:17
It appears the problem is with you, not those that tend to believe scientific tests.
Further, no matter the procedures, you still will claim the human ear and audiophiles are a separate category and not bound by usual results.
Follow Ups:
I subdued my ego and I found my perception of in audibility of perceptual Iof perceptual codecs about matched the scientific empirical results from populations. I. am not a special snowflake, and I'm ok.
Beliefs are a tough nut to crack.
...if you think audio DBTs are scientific, you don't understand what the word means.
Try addressing a criticism head on, MK.
Why do DBT tests NEVER reinforce your position?
Hint: you're wrong.
You remind me of the guys who (shills for oil companies) denounced tobacco testing because none of the tests were perfect.
A damn bit more perfect than pure opinion, of course.
...I have a degree in science - in a field where DBTs were first designed to be used and I have participated in them professionally.
And you?
I would be happy to debate this with you offline.
Hint: audio DBTs are a parlor trick regardless of your mistaken beliefs.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: