|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
70.166.121.142
In Reply to: RE: The first line of my first comment in this thread posted by soulfood on April 05, 2014 at 11:37:49
"I may have called you out by responding but that's no personal attack. If it will make you feel better concede the argument."Called me out? BS you couldn't even respond on point. All you did was rip out a bunch of suggestive ad-hominem and hoped it stuck.
Most certainly I would concede part or all of the comment provided someone with the where with all to shoot it down steps up to do it.
You haven't come close to demonstrating you've got what it takes.
"A conspiracy of one (you-the messenger), makes little sense."
You missed my point - see below.
"I disagree with your agenda. "
Yes of course you can disagree with my suggestion and that's fair enough. However that disagreement in no way influences how these kinds of entities operate and what influences the decisions they make. My conspiracy theory comment was based on your disagreement (clear from your 1st response) and your dismissal of my clearly stated point the first line of my comments. Ie. my referring to it, the financial motivation, must mean that I am suggesting some kind of conspiracy on the part of AA (or in other conversations the industry in general). I am not. You're the one wearing blinders.
Now my agenda was actually something else.....
Give me rhythm or give me death!
Edits: 04/05/14 04/05/14Follow Ups:
When you said in the previous post, "As a money making venture everything and anything that brings people to this site for discussion should be nurtured and preserved.", I thought your agenda was nailed in a manner that would not enable more squirming.
Either you stand by the notion of Sudz deserving special consideration, in the form of payment or you don't. Other than a diversion, there is no point to spreading a wider net of nonsense.
"Either you stand by the notion of Sudz deserving special consideration, in the form of payment or you don't. Other than a diversion, there is no point to spreading a wider net of nonsense."
Actually now you're zeroing in on my agenda. I would have put an end to the nonsense a long time ago. One has to wonder what, if any, financial consideration plays a part in that decision. And your comment about me using Sudz name in the same breath as JA - it may have been me saying it but most certainly I'm not the one who has allowed things to get this far out of wack (see my GA stats above).
Give me rhythm or give me death!
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: