|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
99.140.214.48
In Reply to: RE: AA should pay Sudz posted by Goober58 on April 04, 2014 at 09:03:00
"AA should pay Sudz"
I'm finding it difficult to follow the money/compensation logic. Precisely, how much would say AA owes you?
"I'm betting among AA members Sudz is more well known than John Atkinson - and no doubt he's been the topic of more discussion than JA."
Off of some ill-conceived notion, you obviously think it's fair to use those two in the same sentence.
Follow Ups:
"Precisely, how much would say AA owes you?"
Owes me? AA owes me nothing - occasionally I contribute to AA. What's that question got to do with my query?
"Off of some ill-conceived notion, you obviously think it's fair to use those two in the same sentence."
It's not me Pal - I'm only a messenger. It's the audiophiles on this site who make Sudz the topic of discussion and it's been this way for more than a couple years.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
"It's not me Pal - I'm only a messenger."
Yes, you're the messenger. You can't deny it.
"What's that question got to do with my query?"
What query? You clearly stated, "AA should pay Sudz".
"It's the audiophiles on this site who make Sudz the topic of discussion..."
OK, how much should inmates be paid?
General asylum comments referring to inmate since the beginning of 2014.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
If you have a salient point or even a wayward agenda this is a good time to reveal it.
Apparently you've been too busy running on tangents forming your own personal attacks to have read the first line of my comment in this thread.
"Just for the thousands of posts and 10s of thousands of views they've generated for the site."
There's no salient point or wayward agenda. Figures you would suggest conspiracy theory - yours is not much more than critics corner censorship manifesting itself in the General Asylum. As a money making venture everything and anything that brings people to this site for discussion should be nurtured and preserved.
The way you expand an business or an industry, especially an on-line industry is by increasing and maintaining content. This kind of expansion brings more money into the venture. This is a good thing, there's no reason to deny it.
My comments are clear and obvious and were meant to be constructive. The real question here is what is your agenda?
Give me rhythm or give me death!
"Apparently you've been too busy running on tangents forming your own personal attacks..."
I may have called you out by responding but that's no personal attack. If it will make you feel better concede the argument.
"Figures you would suggest conspiracy theory..."
A conspiracy of one (you-the messenger), makes little sense.
"As a money making venture everything and anything that brings people to this site for discussion should be nurtured and preserved."
I disagree with your agenda.
"I may have called you out by responding but that's no personal attack. If it will make you feel better concede the argument."Called me out? BS you couldn't even respond on point. All you did was rip out a bunch of suggestive ad-hominem and hoped it stuck.
Most certainly I would concede part or all of the comment provided someone with the where with all to shoot it down steps up to do it.
You haven't come close to demonstrating you've got what it takes.
"A conspiracy of one (you-the messenger), makes little sense."
You missed my point - see below.
"I disagree with your agenda. "
Yes of course you can disagree with my suggestion and that's fair enough. However that disagreement in no way influences how these kinds of entities operate and what influences the decisions they make. My conspiracy theory comment was based on your disagreement (clear from your 1st response) and your dismissal of my clearly stated point the first line of my comments. Ie. my referring to it, the financial motivation, must mean that I am suggesting some kind of conspiracy on the part of AA (or in other conversations the industry in general). I am not. You're the one wearing blinders.
Now my agenda was actually something else.....
Give me rhythm or give me death!
Edits: 04/05/14 04/05/14
When you said in the previous post, "As a money making venture everything and anything that brings people to this site for discussion should be nurtured and preserved.", I thought your agenda was nailed in a manner that would not enable more squirming.
Either you stand by the notion of Sudz deserving special consideration, in the form of payment or you don't. Other than a diversion, there is no point to spreading a wider net of nonsense.
"Either you stand by the notion of Sudz deserving special consideration, in the form of payment or you don't. Other than a diversion, there is no point to spreading a wider net of nonsense."
Actually now you're zeroing in on my agenda. I would have put an end to the nonsense a long time ago. One has to wonder what, if any, financial consideration plays a part in that decision. And your comment about me using Sudz name in the same breath as JA - it may have been me saying it but most certainly I'm not the one who has allowed things to get this far out of wack (see my GA stats above).
Give me rhythm or give me death!
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: