|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.223.42.105
In Reply to: RE: " over 60 percent preferred the MP3-converted WAV " posted by beppe61 on March 30, 2014 at 02:16:47
I tried an ABX test with the two tracks, and failed it.... The only time I was able to notice a difference was burning the tracks to CD-R and listening to it on a good CD rig based system.
Follow Ups:
Thanks again and very interesting
Maybe it is a Auto-Tune recording ?
I mean, the original compression/manipulation during the recording can have already done the damage.
I was reading here about some Japanese recordings of extreme quality
Maybe in that case differences between original and MP3 could show up more ?
I think it is important to start with an excellent track.
With hihg dynamic and spatial informations.
Thanks again.
Kind regards,
bg
"Maybe it is a Auto-Tune recording ?"
Not that particular track..... It was a primary reason why I selected it. (Although Aleks Syntek, the artist on the clip, did use Auto-Tune in later albums.)
I think running audio evaluations with an Auto-Tune'd track would be like running photo evaluations of skin tones using sodium lamps..........
Hi and thanks for the info.
I think that the bitrate ratio between original and 320K mp3 should be 4.4 to 1 ?
a good saving of space ...
Thanks again.
Kind regards,
bg
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: