|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
108.249.169.177
In Reply to: RE: my real problem with it all posted by bullethead on January 14, 2017 at 14:21:17
Tidal can't put material on there sight that the label has not encoded in MQA. In the spring the Sony and UMG catalogs will start appearing on Tidal. If you want other music now just do a search and you will probably find a 16/44 streaming of it. Tidal is not charging anything extra for MQA. If you want anything ever recorded stream from the Naxos Music Library but it will cost you $30/month for 320kbs
Alan
Follow Ups:
their alleged use of 'watermarks' on TIDAL tracks?
I did hear one example when comparing TIDAL with QOBUZ where the difference was audible but I have no proof that it was an intentional addition of distortion. Might just as easily been an artifact, but it was very reproducible, whatever it was, and it was NOT evident on the same album track on QOBUZ.
sorry for being wrong then. I didn't know this.
I think the frustration with Tidal for me is they have been talking about streaming MQA for over 3 years. I still can't believe they are actually doing this but yes they have a long way to go. You are correct in your complaints. I was just trying to share some information . Not really saying you are wrong in not being happy with Tidal
Alan
it is a great site, I subscribe to Deezer Elite which I use on a Wyred 4 Sound modified Sonos connect as well.
Already paying for Youtube, Google Music, Google Drive, Deezer Elite and now Tidal :)
lucky for me I don't have pay TV service or I would be under water drowning. Just fiber internet.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: