|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.249.82.149
In Reply to: RE: "so who cares?" posted by genungo on June 17, 2015 at 11:09:12
Hi,
> I guess I'm one of the lucky (unlucky?) ones who has never known
> a well-recorded standard CD to sound that much worse than any
> other format.
Good on you. What you miss though is my point about re-mastering. But never mind.
> I still prefer good old vinyl though.
Well, forgive me please for being such a prick.
But if you never known "a well-recorded standard CD to sound that
much worse than any other format."
How could vinyl be preferrable?
Ciao T
At 20 bits, you are on the verge of dynamic range covering fly-farts-at-20-feet to untolerable pain. Really, what more could we need?
Follow Ups:
I said that I've "...never known a well-recorded standard CD to sound *that much worse* than any other format".I've listened to originals and some re-masters on vinyl, CD, SACD, DVD-A, HDCD, etc... Once again vinyl is often preferable to all others, but only slightly.
PS: You're not a "prick", or penis. Not a vagina or an anus either.
Edits: 06/17/15 06/17/15 06/17/15 06/17/15
Isn't this why the "memory players "were created?? The tonal saturation and lower distortion levels produced by these units was a revelation -to my ears.I wish that I had converted earlier.
Tom:cat
Of course, not everyone would consider "tonal saturation and lower distortion levels" to be on the order of a "revelation". "Slightly better", perhaps?
.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: