|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
67.188.166.191
In Reply to: RE: Blind Testing posted by John Atkinson on October 28, 2016 at 04:13:08
...they seem as relevant as the others.
Follow Ups:
I didn't eliminate them for the result that was published in the magazine.
But I am conjecturing that perhaps I should have because I was keying
my blind identification off of an audible difference but incorrectly
ascribing that difference to what I believed to be the better-sounding
version of the file.
This confusion of "difference" with "preference" often rears its head with
blind testing. See my discussion at the linked article below.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
You got some wrong, published the actual result (credit to you) but are now trying to justify to yourself that you should have cheated when publishing to make yourself look better because the result you got is statistically about as good as pure guessing.
Not exactly the point of blind tests now, is it?
(nt)
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: