|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
71.1.242.123
In Reply to: RE: It's implied by set theory posted by DAP on May 16, 2016 at 11:45:22
Stop spinning. When did he say "all" editors of "other publications"? Now you're putting words into his mouth.
Follow Ups:
'the editors of "other publications"'? [other than Stereophile]
I'm assuming the universe was the set of all audio magazines. You don't think he meant all of them? Is there anything in the text to support your position?
Thanks,
Daniel
It does not matter what I think. The fact is, he never mentioned any person or company and thus broke no rules. That is all that matters.
On the other hand, the rules say "No defamatory statements," which you are repeatedly doing here about a specific person. You are committing defamation of a person's character. I suggest you follow the rules yourself.
My own view is that they would be showing complete disregard for AA rules if they allowed Charles' comment to stand.
Best regards,
Daniel
They apparently already have decided.
You are the only one who broke the rules. Consider yourself fortunate that you are still permitted to post after impugning another member's character.
I'm simply suggesting that the statement
"...the main reason the editors of "other publications" [other than Stereophile] stay away from here because they know they would be exposed as the frauds and charlatans they are"
is not in the best keeping of civil discourse as outlined in the Audio Asylum posting rules ('be civil or be gone.')
Best regards,
Daniel
I won't waste any additional keyboard strokes...
nt
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: