|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
204.94.81.82
In Reply to: RE: Why was Audioquest given Stereophile.com as an "Open Letter" venue? posted by Isaak J. Garvey on January 31, 2016 at 08:16:20
JA also posted a link to Mark Waldrep's response. If the story is news, then the response is news. Why does judgement come into this? What are the motives? To hurt AQ or help defend them?
We'll just have to agree to disagree.
-Rod
Follow Ups:
Fair enough. But I look at it as a bad precedent.
The PROPER way, and I think deep down, Atkinson knows this, was to provide a link to AQ's response from either their web page or their facebook page. This is how every other "news" organization does it.
I think my question as to whether other letters from other high end companies who find them selves in PR trouble will be given the venue is 100% legit.
> The PROPER way, and I think deep down, Atkinson knows this...
Please do not project your own opinions and motivations on to me.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
You seem to operate in a bubble professionally. That is your prerogative.
> You seem to operate in a bubble professionally. That is your prerogative.
Indeed it is. The definitive job description for a magazine editor was
written by Henry Luce, founder of Time and Life magazines: "All great
editors are men able to see how stories, episodes, and personalities flow
and merge one into the other to reproduce the pattern of a world that only
their own inner eye perceives."
> If I was the Publisher or owner of Stereophile I would ask the current
> editor to start grooming his successor, on the double.
Unfortunately for your argument, you are not the "Publisher or owner of
Stereophile." :-)
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
Is Mr Garvey in the cable business ... ?
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: