|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
206.255.209.123
In Reply to: RE: Science, once again rears its... posted by Pat D on December 12, 2014 at 18:27:33
That would be you fewer than thirty minutes after asking that question!
A DBT may determine whether you actually can detect a difference in the sound of your system due to the change in the equipment.
Follow Ups:
Reading comprehension is not your strongest point. Let's look again at what I wrote.
"A DBT may determine whether you actually can detect a difference in the sound of your system due to the change in the equipment."
Where does it say the test is of the differences in equipment? It doesn't. We already know there is a difference in the equipment, and one need not even turn it on to know that. With reasonably accurate measuring equipment, one could doubt measure the performance of each piece and compare the differences.
As Tony Lauck has pointed out, a DBT provides data, and people determine whether the person doing the DBT can detect a difference from the sound alone. Saying that a DBT does it is a linguistic short cut.
The issue is whether the person doing the DBT can detect the difference from the sound alone.
-----
"A fool and his money are soon parted." --- Thomas Tusser
Read again the second and third sentences. Aloud, if necessary.
In particular, pay attention to words found in both sentences!
'Differences' and 'differences one can detect from the sound alone' are not the same thing. As I said, reading comprehension is not your strong point. Neither is good will, I would guess.
-----
"A fool and his money are soon parted." --- Thomas Tusser
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: