|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
67.188.166.191
In Reply to: RE: One can look at that another way. posted by Kal Rubinson on August 03, 2014 at 05:38:35
...from what I've seen, short interval A/B testing with music, not tones, seems best suited to identify differences in gross frequency response, noise, distortion and loudness.Not much else.
With long term observational listening comparisons, all of the differences (and sometimes non-existent ones) can be identified, both objectively and then subjectively including things you are aware of subconsciously.
Edits: 08/03/14Follow Ups:
the former is less likely to be influenced by memories and associations while, for the latter, those are essential.
...the first is more objective because if controlled and blind, it can remove some biases.But with music it's pretty worthless for identifying differences other than the ones mentioned.
Hmmm, except in the hi-rez recording trials John linked.
Edits: 08/04/14
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: