Critic's Corner

• RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) - Sprezza Tura 21:39:24 03/28/14 (7)
  In Reply to: RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) posted by andy_c on March 28, 2014 at 21:25:52

  Uncalled for.
  

  ---

  • RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) - geoffkait 07:42:39 03/29/14 (6)
    In Reply to: RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) posted by Sprezza Tura on March 28, 2014 at 21:39:24

    He has a history of scumbaggery.
    

    ---

    • RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) - sudz1234@yahoo.com 09:31:31 03/30/14 (1)
      In Reply to: RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) posted by geoffkait on March 29, 2014 at 07:42:39

      I like the word scumbaggery.
      

      ---

      • RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) - geoffkait 10:51:17 03/30/14 (0)
        In Reply to: RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) posted by sudz1234@yahoo.com on March 30, 2014 at 09:31:31

        How about the word snarcolepsy?
        

        ---

        Edits: 03/30/14
    • RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) - Sprezza Tura 08:19:44 03/29/14 (3)
      In Reply to: RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) posted by geoffkait on March 29, 2014 at 07:42:39

      Specifics? Otherwise zip it.
      

      ---

      • RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) - geoffkait 08:58:35 03/29/14 (2)
        In Reply to: RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) posted by Sprezza Tura on March 29, 2014 at 08:19:44

        I was referring to the person you responded to. I think his post speaks for itself.
        

        ---

        • RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) - Sprezza Tura 09:04:57 03/29/14 (1)
          In Reply to: RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) posted by geoffkait on March 29, 2014 at 08:58:35

          I apologize. I thought you were referring to SM as well.
          

          ---

          • RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) - geoffkait 09:07:53 03/29/14 (0)
            In Reply to: RE: No surprise: total scumbaggery pays better than partial scumbaggery. (nt) posted by Sprezza Tura on March 29, 2014 at 09:04:57

            No problem. SM is one of the good guys.
            
            Cheers
            

            ---

Post a Followup:

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---