|
Home
/ FAQ
/ News Classifieds / Events |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer |
Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
98.221.11.117
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
I subscribed to Sensible Sound for many years, enjoying Karl Nehring's work as editor. I saw no issues and lost track since mid-2008; I've had no responses to email inquiries. I know that Karl retired - did the mag also "retire"?
Issue #115 was the last one. Magazine sold by John Horan though he may
still have control of the unknown by most of us, WEB site. New owner
plans to contine and honor unfilled subs paid up beyond #115.
Karl Lozier (Karltoo)
I was an initial subscriber to The Sensible Sound, same for The Audio Critic. However I soon gave up on both as I found I learned very little from either one. But I guess someone had to carry on the traditions of Stereo Review and Julian Hirsch. As one wag put it, Hirsch offered two useful bits of information - the component dimensions let you know if you had enough shelf space and the weight indicated if the shelf was strong enough . . .
At least TSS was not guilty of promoting their own products without disclosure like TAC did.
Growing old is hell related former youth.
The equipments found tops in their reviews in the first few issues are still considered great.Quad,Rogers,Vandy,DCM,Dahlquist,Bryston,AR et al.A great pity what happened later to TAC.
...subjectively reviewing 23 different preamps in a single issue. Even though he annointed one king that no one had heard of over the SOTA Levinson.
Then he became ethically challenged with his Fourier louidspeaker and gave it a rave review without mentioning his ownership.
I suspect he used subscribers money to partly bankroll the speaker company. How sleazy is that?
When Fourier went bankrupt and he began publishing TAC again after 7 years, he was an angry, bitter old man with a vendetta against the audio industry.
...so I checked their website and it says the current issue is April/May 2008.
Not a good sign.
whats the difference? much of the equipment sounds the same according to them. i hadnt thought of them in a LONG time.
if they are gone, well thats too bad, we cant afford to lose any but its survival of the fittest. didnt they offer to CHARGE for system advice? hahahahahahahahah! as IF!
...regards...tr![]()
I actually used to enjoy their music reviews but I always wondered why they bothered reviewing electronics since they couldn't seem ever to discern any differences in sound.
Can't say I'm sorry to see them go but can't say I'm happy, either. I'd love to have Listener back, though....
Amen.
To quote Art (out of context): "All that remained was the inky scent of loss."
I'll bet every time the Dudster reads one of these posts he's thinking to himself "So where were your subscription checks, ya hypocritical bastards?"
... to get 35 free years of The Audiophile Voice (well, it seemed that long).
Post a Followup: