|
Home
/ FAQ
/ News Classifieds / Events |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer |
Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
71.157.140.184
In Reply to: RE: I don't want to start any rumours... posted by mkuller on February 06, 2008 at 12:50:40
"I don't want to start any rumours"
Sure you do. You just did. That's fine, I would love to see HP move on. His talents are largely wasted under the present regime. By the way, I am not one of those who bashes TAS at every turn. They did what they needed to to survive, and I think overall have done a pretty good job - but not for Harry.
< < Sure you do. You just did. > > Agreed.< < I would love to see HP move on. His talents are largely wasted under the present regime. > > Agreed.
< < I am not one of those who bashes TAS at every turn. > > Me either. I only bashed them when they deserved it. I've also had public disputes with Stereophile, but their transgressions did not require bashing.
Charles,
You, quite rightly, have different bones to pick with the mags than the mere mortals. Let's face it, none of them are perfect, or anywhere close. If TAS - or Stereophile - was somehow negatively affecting my livelihood, I would no doubt join the bashing troupe. As things stand, my personal greatest single irritation is Tellig's inane use of "I laugh my evil laugh". He's gotten to the point where he inserts the stupid phrase out of context, just to make sure it's in each column (THREE times in the last issue, if I remember correctly). A minor thing, to be sure. Think I'll go bask in a little 'Soular Energy'.
< < none of them are perfect, or anywhere close. If TAS - or Stereophile - was somehow negatively affecting my livelihood, I would no doubt join the bashing troupe > >
Actually, none of my public (or private) disputes with the magazines have been concerned with issues that affected my livelihood (ie, sales of Ayre products). I'm kind of funny that way, as I engage in these conversations sheerly on my principles.
On the other hand, the Stereophile Recommended Components list has definitely impacted my livelihood (ie, sales of Ayre products), sometimes for the better and sometimes for the worse. Sometimes the rankings are fair and sometimes they are not. But I don't really have an argument with Stereophile over this for one simple reason -- as you note, the magazines (and by implication, the RCL) are not perfect, but the problem is that I can't think of any better methods to create an improved RCL (at least ones that are practical). Can you?
Print separate lists for each of the reviewers. That way you can easily get a handle on individual tastes and sensibilities and draw your own conclusions about whose opinions are worth paying attention to. The current scattergun approach has no identifiable point of view and just looks random (if not ridiculous).
< < Print separate lists for each of the reviewers. > >
Stereophile makes it easy to do this, as the RCL always identifies which reviewer(s) made the recommendation.
Below is a link to a post where I made a suggestion on how to use the RCL to your best advantage.
Google came along and there went your analytical skills, eh? I can relate. I freed up so much RAM when Google came out.
![]()
< > Agreed.
;-)
Jim Austin