|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.169.96.149
In Reply to: RE: VH Audio Comparison? posted by WntrMute2 on April 22, 2016 at 03:09:41
One thing I noticed about the v-twist cable is that there was a short break in period. Right off the bat the bass and treble was there but the mid range seemed a little thin. After about twenty-thirty hours the sound was balanced and I am now very happy with them
Follow Ups:
At 30 hours, your V-Twist cable isn't close to being broken in. Chris VH correctly called this for me. The cable needs several hundred hours before it reaches its fully mature state. In my case, I swapped out RCA connectors at some point so I can't say for sure how many hundred hours were needed for the cable alone, but figure on a minimum of 400, maybe more.
Good to know they will sound better in the future! I didn't know if they were fully broke in or not but after about 30 hours I heard the difference.
After the first 30 hours, you may have experienced the typical preliminary burn-in time of solder joints. While the cellular FEP/Teflon insulated V-Twist requires ample burn-in time, the cable should sound quite good from the start, however a bit congested, since the low-mass AirLok dielectric involves minimal dielectric absorption. I recommend setting an alert/reminder to note obvious improvements at the 250 hour mark, with the stipulation that subtle improvements will continue to develop after many more hours of burn-in time.
Just let the cables run 24/7 with a CD on endless repeat or with a FM tuner as the source. That's the only practical way to let the cables run in over a reasonable time.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: