|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
68.109.182.210
In Reply to: RE: Cable Cooking/Burnin posted by PingPing on October 28, 2015 at 23:50:58
With the the audiodharma Cable Cooker what is your suggested method/approach?
The method that works best, and consistently, is Cooking a given cable (or multiple cables) for a set amount of time, then re-installing it in the music system, then allowing the cables to settle in with the music signal (AC draw with power cables). Tried-and-true over 16 years of practice. To further define the process, I always recommend progressive "Cooking-and-listening sessions", which sort out the optimal amount of hours a given cable needs to sound its best. This process is addressed on the FAQ page of my website.
What do you think of a 10hrs on/2hrs off approach, where the 2hrs off simply allows the magnetic effects that build up in the cooking/burnin components to subside/drain away, before the cooking/burnin is continued?
Again, another theory, and wasted time. Why not fully Cook the cable, then let those pesky "magnetic effects" drain away afterwards? Time saved, at the very least.
Please note that the conditioning process is similar to a sine wave....there are peaks and valleys. It's always possible that an arbitrary time period will produce a (temporarily) bad-sounding result, and in the real world that occurs frequently. That's why progressive Cooking-and-listening sessions best determine when a cable is "done". One's ears determine that.
Follow Ups:
Could it be that those pesky "magnetic effects" are occasionally (from time to time) producing a (temporarily) bad-sounding cooking/burnin result?
Could very well be, PingPing....good insight. And another reason NOT to perform the on / off conditioning method. If indeed magnetic effects are contributing to bad sound, then it makes good (and better) sense to fully condition a cable (such as what the Cable Cooker can do) rather than start-and-stop the process.
[quote]Could very well be, PingPing....good insight. And another reason NOT to perform the on/off conditioning method. If indeed magnetic effects are contributing to bad sound, then it makes good (and better) sense to fully condition a cable (such as what the Cable Cooker can do) rather than start-and-stop the process. [quote]By on/off, my thoughts are, leave the cables connected and turn the cooker OFF then after about 2hrs turn the cooker back ON and continue the cooking process for about 10hrs, and so on... hopefully, this will negate any magnetic effects that might creep into the cooking process.
Edits: 11/07/15
Firstly, you are presuming that "magnetic effects" are occurring, and that those are "bad". Neither of us knows if that is true. There are, of course, electromagnetic "effects" occurring through all wires, as current travels down those wires. With power cables, it's much stronger, and that "halo" of electromagnetic energy is measurable.
But these electromagnetic "effects" will occur regardless....turning off the Cable Cooker will not stop them, nor will the laws of physics stop working, anymore than shutting your system off from playing music.
Who came up with this theory of "magnetic effects" being deleterious?
I know Rick Schultz of High Fidelity Cables uses actual magnets to control and effect signal flow....but he also uses the audiodharma Cable Cooker with his cables, and has for many years. He's never mentioned this as an issue. In fact we recently talked about his newest technology at the Rocky Mountain Audiofest, and spoke briefly about the idea of combining technologies.
Sorry, I meant electromagnetic "effects" which I assumed in the scheme of things are the same as magnetic "effects" :) Won't the electromagnetic "effects" dissipate to ground once the electronics is turned off? I am definitely not saying audiodharma Cable Cooker although, I suppose/guess, all electronics is affected by electromagnetic "effects" in some way :)I cook my cables using an old CDP and an old 25watt integrated amp, where I can set the volume, into a 10watt 5.5R resistor using a couple of music CD's that I like for this process :) Hence my interest in cable cookers, so, all information that can help make up mind is good information :)
Edits: 11/09/15
Cable burnin/cookin has always worked for me and I burnin/cookin my cables using an old CDP and an old 25watt integrated amp, where I can set the volume, into a 10watt 5.5R resistor using a couple of music CD's that I like for this process :) Hence my interest in cable cookers, so, all information that can help make up mind is good information :)
Edits: 11/10/15 11/10/15
Electromagnetic effects have never been a concern to me or my consulting engineers....to me it's not an issue. Delivering the most effective / highest quality output signal, together with reasonably heat-efficient circuitry has always been the goal. Hence, we are in our 7th generation.
Much more important than any theory about conditioning cables are the results. Your ears do the judging. My 3 cents.
How long can a full conditioning (generally) take with a cable cooker and can magnetic effects occur during the cable cooker process?
I have found that 5 days generally works well for my power cords, 3 days for interconnects, and 5 days for speaker cables. After conditioning and reinstallation I use the system realizing that the system will take 2 to 3 days to settle in from the connections being reestablished.
The newest develpoment in power cord conditioning is conditioning of the ground wire on power cords. AudioDharma sells an adaptor that runs a signal through the ground at the same time the hot and neutral wires are being conditioned. On my previously conditioned power cords, I heard a major improvement when the same cord had the ground wire conditioned.
I hope Ping Ping can find a source in Australia to experience what his cables are truly capable of after being fully conditioned.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: