Cable Asylum

"Luminator has posted his positive experiences with these cables a number of times"

166.164.0.189

Awe-d-o-file

M

In Reply to: RE: Thanks and cable cooker question posted by alan m. kafton on September 01, 2015 at 02:22:49

Excuse my ignorance but did you mean to say cable cookers or cables? The reason I ask is I don't see a cable brand the OP mentioned or that anyone mentioned in this subthread either. Just an inquiring mind wanting to know. When I have spare ducks I will buy your cooker. That may be some time.

Several close friends have recommended them. One even offered to cook my cables. I wouldn't want to go w/o them too long and he is 100 miles away. One of these years I will coordinate it with a vacation week or something.......

Follow Ups:

RE: "Luminator has posted his positive experiences with these cables a number of times" - alan m. kafton 12:15:12 09/03/15 (2)
Lummy has extensive experience Cooking various models of MIT cables, along with many other brands. The reference in the other post was to cables "with network boxes". He has posted links to his blog several times, and recently did so again.

Probably best if he responds directly, if I haven't answered your question adequately.
- At The Moment, I Am Actually Not Reviewing A Cable - Luminator 18:16:12 09/03/15 (1)
  My audiodharma Cable Cooker's board is being retrofitted with fuses. So for now, I am actually not reviewing a cable. Without any cables to review, I have been wearing the DJ hat. As some of you know, people ask me for popular music suggestions. Two audiophiles just thanked me for David Foster's duet with Olivia Newton-John, "The Best Of Me;" and Journey's "Why Can't This Night Go On Forever." Apparently, their guests loved these songs, and gasped in wonder, why they had never heard them before.
  Go to my homepage. For now, you will find posts about the Simaudio 750D. But go beyond those posts, and you'll find years and years of posts covering audio and video cables. All since the mid-00s have been properly conditioned on, at a minimum, the Cable Cooker. Said Cooker has also been the subject of a few posts.
  I've had this particular Cable Cooker since 2003. Since then, it has treated thousands of interconnects, speaker cables, bi-wire jumpers, AC outlets, phono cables, internal tonearm wiring, video cables, digital cables, powercords, and raw wire.
  In all these years, the only products which could not be Cooked were Tara Labs' ISM Power Screens. In this case, there was NO damage to either the product or the Cooker; the Cooker merely does not pass signal.
  The Cable Cooker should be considered mandatory for not just conventional cables, but networked MIT and Transparent Audio cables.
  Here on AA, go to the Product Reviews section. Then click on the Cable hyperlink. You'll find everyone's reviews. Mine are buried amongst them. As of this writing, I have written 7 reviews of MIT products, all of which have been treated and transformed by the Cable Cooker.
  -Lummy The Loch Monster
  
  Edits: 09/03/15
  - RE: At The Moment, I Am Actually Not Reviewing A Cable - fantja 09:54:07 09/05/15 (0)
    Nice Pic! Lummy.

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Amplified Parts