|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
206.190.70.130
In Reply to: RE: Thoughtful and reasonable post -- thank you posted by TheBrewmaster on March 22, 2014 at 14:52:44
I have a hypothesis (somewhat in line with my experience) that better equipment, which typically costs more, drives the cables better and therefore the sonic differences among cables diminish. Many of us cannot afford equipment which is oblivious to cables, so we get the best sonic value by combining appropriate cables with the other hardware.
Follow Ups:
But I figure it's rather more like links in a chain. The weakest link is still where the chain breaks down, even if the other links are unbreakable on their own. The question is to what extent high quality copper wire varies in "link strength" i.e. are there truly "weak" cables versus are there truly "strong" sounding cables. Obviously a polarizing topic with varying opinions. For one side, however, they can offer very little measurable proof to support their opinions. So here we are. Lest this trigger another round of arguments, let me re-state my personal opinion: Yes, cables impact the sound and can sound differently. But no, the difference is not huge, it's rather exaggerated by many.
I must disagree with the premise that sonic differences among cables diminish as one climbs the high-end audio ladder.
On the contrary, the high performance potential of hi-end cables diminish when placed on mid-fi gear (casting pearls before swine is too strong a term so I won't use it here...).
I was trying to hypothesize why some people do not hear differences which seem large to me. But I can say that I have had components which are less sensitive to cables than others.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: