![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
24.150.0.186
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: Cable Asylum vs Hydrogenaudio posted by thebordas on May 12, 2012 at 05:44:11
Not sure are you addressing me Elizabeth. I'm actually a great believer in quality cables, commensurate with the investment in other equipment. I imagine the $6000 MIT speaker cables would compliment a $10K amp and $15K speakers nicely and Dave has one hell of a system.
Follow Ups:
I'm not elizabeth? But if the compliment is directed towards me...thanks!
dave_b
Bored Ass, I have to take a back seat to your clever, insidious psychological warfare. Not listing your observations in the context of cable upgrading would absolutely devastate me - to the point where I would wonder if the cable would "add more pixels to every instrument and every note and notes harmonic structure including overtones; and if the music would bubble over with color and dead on accurate tonality". All this with the addition of a tube buffer between solid state components?
I'm speechless.
That's the spirit Mango Jury. And I thought you were hard of hearing. Have you been sneaking in my house when I'm not home? I knew I turned the stereo off the other weekend...damn! Well, at least you saved me the drudgery of having to describe the sound of my system with the MIT's in place. You should have waited till they were fully broken in however! Oh, that's right, you probably don't believe in breakin either:O( Bored ass over and out:O)
dave_b
Post a Followup:
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: