|
Home
/ FAQ
/ News Classifieds / Events |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer |
Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
66.47.253.226

...I got gunned down for sticking $$$$ interconnects on cheap equipment? You should have seen how upset the audiophile community was, when I used the $625 XLO Signature 1.1 interconnect on the $99 original Sony Playstation. But I reported the truth. And that truth was that the XLO Sig 1.1 unlocked the Playstation's sonic potential. All along, using patch cords, the PS1's sound was shrug-your-shoulders okay. But my brother and his teenaged friends were unprepared for just how friggin' awesome the video gaming experience would become, when the sound was detailed, sharp, focused, fast, and punchy.I then raised the audiophiles' ire by replacing the XLO Sig 1.1 with Kimber KS-1030, Tara Labs The One, and XLO's Limited Edition. Even with the "lowly" PS1 as a source, the differences in each interconnect were apparent.
Well, today, the Tara Labs The One and XLO LE seem downright cheap, compared to some other cables we use. But recently, my audio buds returned my old cables from the 90s. So I decided to revisit some of them.
If you've been following my blog [click on link below], you already have seen my reviews of, among other things, the XLO Reference Types 1, 2, and 4. And now I've added some information on the very product that started this madness, the XLO Signature 1.1.
The big difference, this time around, is that we now have high-end audio's MVP, the Cable Cooker. In the mid-90s, when XLO Sig 1.1 was all the rage, the Cable Cooker had not yet been invented. Well, it turns out that the Sig 1.1 is even better than we previously thought. You see, I've Cooked several pairs, and compared them to un-Cooked samples. The Cooked Sig 1.1 is more free of a static-y hiss, a garbled and harsh grain. This allows the music to more naturally bloom. The images are less 2-dimensional, less like sticking Post-Its on the board. There's less haze between the images, so you can "see" through the sound field more easily. And it doesn't matter whether I'm using the cheap Sony PS1 or the expensive EAR Acute. The Cooked Sig 1.1 has the better ability to get out of the way, and preserve whatever signal it is asked to transport.
In some ways, a Cooked XLO Sig 1.1 sounds cleaner and more resolving than an un-cooked Nordost Valhalla, which costs 5x that of Sig 1.1. So this is an important development. Those old cables of yours may be significantly better than you ever imagined. It's just that, in order to unlock their potential, you have to get (or use) a Cable Cooker. Hell, even if you have something affordable, such as Kimber Timbre, you can eliminate most of that fizzy distortion, simply by Cooking the cable.
Everybody's rushing out to Cook the latest and greatest cables. But before you acquire Nordost Odin*, or whatever juices your lizard, Cook your old cables first. You may discover that those old cables are more than adequate, and you no longer "need" expensive new cables.
-Lummy The Seahorse
*I use and love Nordost Odin. A requirement of Odin is that dealers must treat it with Nordost's VIDAR burn-in device. For the record, I have taken Odin, and put it on the Cable Cooker. Indeed, the Cable Cooker is even more effective than the VIDAR. If your Odin seems slightly diffuse, ghostly, or out-of-phase, those characteristics will go away, if you stick your Odin on a Cable Cooker for a day or two.
Edits: 03/18/08
is burning in silver based products. I don't think I would ever try a commercial silver product w/o the cooker on hand. It's also extremely helpful when doing R&D...
I have used my Audiodharma Cable Cooker for five years. It is the best investment I have made to keep my system sounding great.
Highly recommended...Edit 2009:
Upgraded 6-2009 to Pro version with Alan's
new Extended Frequency Sweep (EFS) circuit.
Circuit board deep cryoed and cryoed ACBP Cardas binding posts.Four photos of my Cable Cooker in use...
:¬)
your old cables should be thoroughly cooked by definition ...if they have been connected to your gear for more than 1000 hours ....the cooker just reduces the time the inital burn takes !
... and can confirm that even veteran cables with many hours on them can benefit from 72 hours on it. Not all do, but in some cases it's pretty amazing.

Please re-read my chronicles.
My XLO Signature 1.1 interconnects were purchased in 1995-1998. I actually have four 1-meter Sig 1.1s. [I also have the balanced Sig 2.1, but I haven't blogged about that yet. I'm currently evaluating the XLO Ref5A speaker cable and some 12AX7s]. Anyway, those 1.1s have been in use for 10 years, in various systems.
When I received the XLO interconnects back from my audio buddy, we took a listen in my main system. As expected, the Sig 1.1 preserved image focus, but the ride was a little bumpy. And I think this has to do with the mids being a tad pinched or leaned out.
We Cooked one pair for 2 days, and a second pair for 1 day. We then compared these to the other two un-Cooked pairs. No contest. The Cooked pairs had more ease, balance, and freedom from grain. The soundstage, when recordings held such spatial information, spread out in width, height, and depth.
NO amount of playing time ever equals a day (or more) of Cooking. The Cable Cooker provides a high current signal/algorithm. It's kind of like when my 20-month-old son is congested. He doesn't know how to (deliberately or intentionally) cough or blow his nose. No amount of his breathing (equivalent to regular cable use) will clear his congestion like me digging out his boogers and sucking out his phlegm (equivalent to the Cable Cooker treatment).
My audio buddy and I then took the Cooked Sig 1.1, and stuck it on the old (circa 1993) CAL Sigma II. Holy smokes! Though the Sigma II is a dinosaur, we were surprised at how well it performed, when treated with nice and properly Cooked cables. That's not unlike using good cables on the original Sony Playstation.
your old cables should be thoroughly cooked by definition
Most think that's the case, but it isn't so, and the case has been disproved thousands of times by a myriad of Cooker users. The relatively weak system signal does not thoroughly condition the cables, regardless of the number of hours used. Signal amplitude and duration are only two of the factors related to the proper conditioning of cables.
if they have been connected to your gear for more than 1000 hours
1000 hours? How and where did you come up with this number? Why not say 10,000 hours? It's still irrelevant.
the cooker just reduces the time the inital burn takes!
In practice, beyond the initial conditioning, all cables retrograde in performance over time, requiring a "recharge", which takes less time than the initial conditioning. This, too, has been proven over and over again. Cables do not maintain stasis, and this recharge is necessary to maintain high performance on a long-term basis. The qualitative results are another matter....it's not just a time factor.
I'll leave it to Luminator or another Cooker owner to comment further.
NT
Greetings from the sunny Brønshøj riveria on the banks of the lovely Utterslev Mose