|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.75.227.214
In Reply to: RE: New Class D from ATI posted by Mr Peabody on September 04, 2016 at 20:24:35
No one will read that mess of a paragraph here, if it ran be red at the Home Theater Review website.
Even less if you have nothing else to say but copy the article.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane."
Follow Ups:
I found it to be of interest and appreciate it being brought to my attention. I am the owner of an ATI amp and have been very pleased by it.
Thank you Mr.Peabody for your efforts.
Willis
Thanks Willis. Now I see why there are so few new posts on the forum.
I'm interested to hear one of the new Class D to see if they have the same muscle like the A/B.
My S/S system uses a pair of Primare A34.2, configured in mono, which puts out 550 watts @ 8ohms. They are Class D, using a unique configuration (ultra fast power device-see link below). They output 150 watts in stereo, and seemed to have as much muscle as any given class AB amps I've had over the years.
The reason I went with the monoblock option is that the extra power definitely improves performance across the board. The sound stage get wider, deeper, and the presentation just sounds closer to the original event. This is especially noticeable with music that has a very wide amount of dynamic contrasts. Clipping is pretty much non existent.
The point here is that the extra wattage from state of the art Class D amps is generally preferable to a lower powered Class AB amp.
"What this country needs is a good 5 watt amplifier!" (Paul Klipsch)
A link and that second paragraph would be good.
ET
"If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking till you do suck seed" - Curly Howard 1936
Why do you ask stupid questions?
No, it is not. However, both of your post are, because:
1. There are zillions of new product announcements on the web. Copying the whole announcement is meaningless.
2. You were not even capable to format it in readable format.
3. You did not give any thoughts of your own or reason for posting.
4. Then you ask me why am I posting stupid posts while it only questioned meaninglessness of your original post
If you do not see stupidity of "thought" process...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane."
Well,
Out of the thousands I chose what I chose to post.
No where on AA do I see people giving a reason why they post.If you didn't find it of interest then you should have shut up and moved on.
If you can't read that sounds like a personal problem.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: