|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
68.81.164.49
In Reply to: RE: You started correctly... but... posted by John Elison on September 29, 2015 at 08:18:11
Figure, 100 Ohm output resistance.
Follow Ups:
It doesn't matter what the output resistance is for the preamp; you no longer have a balanced connection because you no longer have a balanced load. That may or may not make an audible difference, but it is definitely not ideal. The two outputs should be buffered if you intend to use them simultaneously. On the other hand, if you can't hear any difference, it might not matter to you. It just depends. I, personally, wouldn't be happy with such a configuration.
Best regards,
John Elison
But you just wrote earlier:
" Furthermore, it would be more than a restive load because the unbalanced cables to the sub have capacitance and if they happen to be 25-feet long like the cables to my sub, this presents significant capacitance."
After which I asked you to describe their effect. You then stated, totally incorrectly, that the output resistance does not matter.
OK... I am out of this discussion.
You stated that the imbalance from the load of the sub was purely resistive and I was pointing out that it also had a reactive component due to cable capacitance. Regardless of whether the load is purely resistive or partially reactive, it constitutes an imbalance to a supposedly balanced connection. The reactive component will create phase shift to the audio signal on one of the supposedly balanced legs. My point is that I, personally, would not be happy with that situation in my audio system.
> OK... I am out of this discussion.
Well, it's about time!
Good luck,
John Elison
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: