|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
72.70.101.207
In Reply to: RE: "the Stereo 35/SCA-35 is actually the best sounding amp Dynaco ever made" posted by 1973shovel on November 09, 2014 at 19:10:25
You piqued my curiosity, so I pulled up the schematics for the Stereo 35 and the SCA-35. The power amp sections seem pretty similar between the two, with the phase inverter topology the same as far as I can see – a form of cathodyne phase inverter in both cases, correct?A difference is that the first section of the 7247 uses a straight triode that I believe is for some voltage gain (or is it more of a buffering role?), while the first section of the 7199 is a pentode used for the same purpose, though in the SCA-35 schematic it looks like the 7199 is hooked up in a way that does not use all five electrodes, rather, it looks like it is running in some sort of triode mode(?) with the screen grid connected in some kind of feedback, no?
So, the first section of the 7199 has some differences in the associated circuitry, but this looks to be just what was needed to accommodate the inherent operating characteristics of the first section of the 7199 vs. the first section of the 7247. There are also some differences in the feedback schemes, but the distortion specs are very close – I don't think I could tell the difference between 0.1% and 0.2% IMD "at average listening levels."
I confess that I am not an engineer, but these two circuits look far closer to each other than the difference between the original Stereo 70 two-tube gain plus cathodyne phase inverter vs. the three-tube gain plus long tail inverter Roy uses in his Stereo 70 circuit.
Edits: 11/09/14 11/09/14Follow Ups:
Nor am I, not even close.
Now is as good a time as any to say that I follow your posts, both here on the Dynaco Asylum, and at the Dynaco tube audio forum. I always enjoy reading what you write. My point being, you seem to know your way around a tube amp, and are willing to help others.
That being said, and admitting once again that I'm not an engineer, I'm going to switch to subjectivity here. It has been my experience that a ST-35 is a better sounding amplifier than a SCA-35. As to the "why" of that, I'll leave up to those more technically qualified to explain. I've always been told (and read) that it was due to the 7247 being a better sounding tube than the 7199.
I wish the original poster good luck in finding what you are looking for. I didn't intend to take your post off topic.
Thank you, and I appreciate the discussion.
Best regards,
Peter
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: