Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share youe ideas and experiences.
Return to K&K Audio / Lundahl Transformers
82.217.1.124
found out the hard way...by trying...that stainless steel sucks to work with.Anyway...saw this when I tagged along with my wife to IKEA...it is to put a little wax light under and keep your food warm. But when I saw it..I thought RAKK DAC. ;-)
Unfortunately have not listened to it yet...!!! :-(
Follow Ups:
Was browsing the digital forum...followed a link to Ack! Dac!...and to my suprise!!! My Ikea idea... was not at all original!!! Must have seen it before...and that must have triggered the thought of using it for the RAKK.
To infinity and beyond!!!
![]()
.
To infinity and beyond!!!
![]()
The RAKK dac is a marvelous converter. Enjoy!
Great job Bas! I have added your pictures to the Gallery.Dave
![]()
when I have...I'll send you a pic or 2.
Yes, I'll bet the holes for the connectors weren't fun. However, it does look cool!
Kevin Carter
K&K Audio
www.kandkaudio.com
![]()
do you know how hard it was to drill all those ventilation holes!!! ;-)
how does it sound? Compared to your DDDAC 2000 especially...
I just rigged it up last night...to see if it worked...and listened to a track or 2.Out of the box though, it sounded a little more forward than the DDDAC143.
I'll keep you all up to date with my listening impressions...
Cheers,
Bas
Hi Bas,Remember to break it in before serious evaluation. See the recent posts on this forum.
"BURN" them with 5-30v, now that they are allready soldered in place....Cheers,
Bas
Hi Bas,Just use the regular CD signal, it will take a little longer but it works fine.
Dave,Why not solder in 6K resistors instead of 3K and burn it in for 200 hours and then switch back to 3K or whatever (1.5K in my case since I only need 1 V rms output). That way you can burn it in with 4V rms (or close to it).
Is that what you mean? What is the maximum resistance/voltage you recommend on the output of the passive RAKK dac option to break it in? You could use a cheap resistor and then switch back to the Mills when all is done.
Hi Anand,That is an interesting idea. I haven't given it any thought until now and I am not sure that the resistance on the secondary makes much if any difference here. The reason is that the current will be the same in all cases and the current is internal in the transformer while the current to voltage conversion is in the external resistor.
To speed up the process you would have to increase the internal current by increasing the input signal.
At least that is my current thinking and the floor is open for comments.
you are correct. The current to voltage conversion is through the resistor, so any increased voltage will only be after the transformer.Lateral thinking just set in. Thanks.
So if we can increase the signal ahead of the transformer (ie. after digital to analog conversion), that would be one way. Or else we'll just have to wait for 250 hours.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: