The Signature Sound Lounge

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share you ideas and experiences.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Re: was that a MkII LA-150

Posted by clio09 on January 22, 2007 at 04:27:26:
No, it was a MkI version of the LA-150 with the Russian tubes. I found this version of the LA-150 to be much more neutral, but slightly more detailed as well versus the LA-100m MkIII. The LA-100 MkIII tends to be a bit more neutral than most tube preamps I have heard, but is definitely one of the most musical preamps I have heard as well. What it sacrifices in detail versus the LA-150 MkI, and it's not much, it makes up for in musicality. My understanding is Jud changed the circuit in the LA-150 MkII to replace the Russian tubes with 6350s, giving the unit a more musical sound and better extension. I'd love to hear one of these versions for comparative purposes.