General Asylum: Now that's a convincing argument by Craiger56

RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 10:02:46 07/18/12 ( 3)

RE: Why surround sound is not "high end?" - Sumflow 23:55:15 07/20/12 ( 2)
- RE: Why surround sound is not "high end?" - Raymond Leggs 15:09:53 07/21/12 ( 1)
  - RE: Why surround sound is not "high end?" - Raymond Leggs 15:16:47 07/21/12 ( 0)

RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - hahax@verizon.net 21:19:08 07/15/12 ( 0)

RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 12:21:26 07/15/12 ( 12)

RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - josh358 17:37:42 07/18/12 ( 4)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 17:57:35 07/18/12 ( 3)
  - RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - josh358 18:15:52 07/18/12 ( 2)
    - RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 21:26:33 07/18/12 ( 1)
      - RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - josh358 06:52:29 07/19/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - 3db 04:47:56 07/18/12 ( 1)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 09:08:57 07/18/12 ( 0)
Is there a conflict here? ;-) - Kal Rubinson 13:03:42 07/15/12 ( 4)
- LOL !! - AbeCollins 13:32:27 07/15/12 ( 3)
  - RE: LOL !! - pictureguy 18:42:22 07/15/12 ( 2)
    - Too much information. It was just a jab. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 07:17:57 07/16/12 ( 1)
      - RE: Too much information. It was just a jab. (NT) - pictureguy 08:11:45 07/16/12 ( 0)

For me, multichannel is better than stereo - Tubo 10:23:25 07/15/12 ( 2)

Now that's a convincing argument - Craiger56 07/15/12 20:48:16 07/15/12 ( 1)
- RE: Now that's a convincing argument - middleground 09:49:49 07/17/12 ( 0)

Says who? - mark111 09:50:18 07/15/12 ( 0)

I spent a lot on a surround system.. Just not as much as on my two channel - Elizabeth 09:16:33 07/15/12 ( 16)

Elizabeth which Bryston do you have? nt - theob 09:38:25 07/15/12 ( 15)
- Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Elizabeth 10:18:50 07/15/12 ( 14)
  - RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 12:57:20 07/15/12 ( 0)
  - RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 12:12:53 07/15/12 ( 12)
    - RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Raymond Leggs 12:31:54 07/15/12 ( 4)
      - RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - abs1 13:41:45 07/15/12 ( 3)
        
        RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - tmsorosk 15:05:06 07/15/12 ( 2)
        
        Sometimes the used bargain is a great relief from over the top high prices.. - Elizabeth 15:54:30 07/15/12 ( 1)
        
        RE: Sometimes the used bargain is a great relief from over the top high prices.. - Raymond Leggs 16:01:45 07/15/12 ( 0)
    - RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 12:28:14 07/15/12 ( 6)
      - RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Dawnrazor 22:46:57 07/15/12 ( 3)
        
        RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 05:44:44 07/16/12 ( 2)
        
        RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Dawnrazor 21:23:58 07/18/12 ( 1)
        
        RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 05:58:16 07/19/12 ( 0)
      - RI bought the DEQ2496 on a whim and have never really explored it's capabilities, i do use it pass through - Elizabeth 13:49:41 07/15/12 ( 1)
        
        RE: RI bought the DEQ2496 on a whim and have never really explored it's capabilities, i do use it pass through - theob 15:11:50 07/15/12 ( 0)

Space and Pride - genungo 08:37:48 07/15/12 ( 0)

You are too concerned with labels. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 07:49:26 07/15/12 ( 0)

RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - middleground 06:47:49 07/15/12 ( 0)

RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - middleground 06:42:15 07/15/12 ( 0)

fine for movies - tmsorosk 05:57:37 07/15/12 ( 15)

Wrong. - Kal Rubinson 07:48:14 07/15/12 ( 13)
- RE: Wrong. - Paully 10:47:54 07/15/12 ( 12)
  - RE: Wrong. - josh358 17:07:03 07/18/12 ( 3)
    - RE: Wrong. - Paully 17:39:27 07/18/12 ( 2)
      - RE: Wrong. - josh358 17:51:36 07/18/12 ( 1)
        
        Right - tmsorosk 17:53:11 07/18/12 ( 0)
  - RE: Wrong. - middleground 11:31:55 07/16/12 ( 0)
  - Methinks you misunderstood Kal's comments - willkayakforfood 11:19:18 07/15/12 ( 6)
    - And music from a 2-channel system also has reflected sound; engineers realize this (good ones) and so create. - tinear 16:05:10 07/15/12 ( 1)
      - But it comes at you from the wrong direction! (nt) - Kal Rubinson 17:53:59 07/15/12 ( 0)
    - RE: Methinks you misunderstood Kal's comments - Pally 13:35:16 07/15/12 ( 0)
    - Yup. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 12:58:40 07/15/12 ( 0)
    - Ambisonic encoding / recording may get much closer to correct surround recording. Interesting link, - cfb 12:28:21 07/15/12 ( 1)
      - Perhaps. - Kal Rubinson 13:00:56 07/15/12 ( 0)
RE: fine for movies - middleground 06:42:53 07/15/12 ( 0)

I think it's the material - Frihed89 00:42:07 07/15/12 ( 4)

not like Star Wars - pbarach 13:31:30 07/18/12 ( 1)
- RE: not like Star Wars - Raymond Leggs 14:57:05 07/18/12 ( 0)
RE: I think it's the material - abs1 04:33:27 07/15/12 ( 1)
- Nice. - Kal Rubinson 08:45:45 07/15/12 ( 0)

Different mind sets. - Teresa 23:32:29 07/14/12 ( 0)

RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - russ69 22:51:43 07/14/12 ( 0)

RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - Iron Knee 22:29:03 07/14/12 ( 0)