 
|
General Asylum: RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt by Raymond Leggs General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
General Asylum: RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt by Raymond Leggs General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
For Sale Ads |
108.205.227.82
In Reply to: RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt posted by theob on July 15, 2012 at 12:12:53:
I think that if you have $20,000.00 to spend any system you buy wont be low end.
The whole avoiding cluttering up the living room with sound equipment thing is a silly notion. There are plenty of great speakers that arent the size of fridge out there, look at Reaga, Linn , monitor audio, etc.
a $3000-$5000.00 Rotel or Arcam Receiver or Pre-pro is still entry level high end and thier 2 channel performance rivals that of a lot of dedicated 2 channel integrateds in the same price range.
What I have now I wouldn't call High end, but its definately not low-end or "low fi" I would say its lower mid-fi but not Higher mid fi or entry level high end. Which are one int he same IMO.
Low end to me is Bose period. Cheapo boomboxes, Ipod earbuds and thier docks mini systems HTIB's $25.00 dayton bookshelf speakers, cheapjack speakers that sell for under $100.00 at best buy. the stuff that makes my head hurt.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Why is surround sound not "high end"? - Raymond Leggs 21:27:41 07/14/12 ( 67)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 10:02:46 07/18/12 ( 3)
- RE: Why surround sound is not "high end?" - Sumflow 23:55:15 07/20/12 ( 2)
- RE: Why surround sound is not "high end?" - Raymond Leggs 15:09:53 07/21/12 ( 1)
- RE: Why surround sound is not "high end?" - Raymond Leggs 15:16:47 07/21/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - hahax@verizon.net 21:19:08 07/15/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 12:21:26 07/15/12 ( 12)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - josh358 17:37:42 07/18/12 ( 4)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 17:57:35 07/18/12 ( 3)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - josh358 18:15:52 07/18/12 ( 2)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 21:26:33 07/18/12 ( 1)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - josh358 06:52:29 07/19/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - 3db 04:47:56 07/18/12 ( 1)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 09:08:57 07/18/12 ( 0)
Is there a conflict here? ;-) - Kal Rubinson 13:03:42 07/15/12 ( 4)
- LOL !! - AbeCollins 13:32:27 07/15/12 ( 3)
- RE: LOL !! - pictureguy 18:42:22 07/15/12 ( 2)
- Too much information. It was just a jab. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 07:17:57 07/16/12 ( 1)
- RE: Too much information. It was just a jab. (NT) - pictureguy 08:11:45 07/16/12 ( 0)
For me, multichannel is better than stereo - Tubo 10:23:25 07/15/12 ( 2)
- Now that's a convincing argument - Craiger56 20:48:16 07/15/12 ( 1)
- RE: Now that's a convincing argument - middleground 09:49:49 07/17/12 ( 0)
Says who? - mark111 09:50:18 07/15/12 ( 0)
I spent a lot on a surround system.. Just not as much as on my two channel - Elizabeth 09:16:33 07/15/12 ( 16)
- Elizabeth which Bryston do you have? nt - theob 09:38:25 07/15/12 ( 15)
- Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Elizabeth 10:18:50 07/15/12 ( 14)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 12:57:20 07/15/12 ( 0)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 12:12:53 07/15/12 ( 12)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Raymond Leggs 07/15/12 12:31:54 07/15/12 ( 4)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - abs1 13:41:45 07/15/12 ( 3)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - tmsorosk 15:05:06 07/15/12 ( 2)
- Sometimes the used bargain is a great relief from over the top high prices.. - Elizabeth 15:54:30 07/15/12 ( 1)
- RE: Sometimes the used bargain is a great relief from over the top high prices.. - Raymond Leggs 16:01:45 07/15/12 ( 0)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 12:28:14 07/15/12 ( 6)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Dawnrazor 22:46:57 07/15/12 ( 3)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 05:44:44 07/16/12 ( 2)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Dawnrazor 21:23:58 07/18/12 ( 1)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 05:58:16 07/19/12 ( 0)
- RI bought the DEQ2496 on a whim and have never really explored it's capabilities, i do use it pass through - Elizabeth 13:49:41 07/15/12 ( 1)
- RE: RI bought the DEQ2496 on a whim and have never really explored it's capabilities, i do use it pass through - theob 15:11:50 07/15/12 ( 0)
Space and Pride - genungo 08:37:48 07/15/12 ( 0)
You are too concerned with labels. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 07:49:26 07/15/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - middleground 06:47:49 07/15/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - middleground 06:42:15 07/15/12 ( 0)
fine for movies - tmsorosk 05:57:37 07/15/12 ( 15)
- Wrong. - Kal Rubinson 07:48:14 07/15/12 ( 13)
- RE: Wrong. - Paully 10:47:54 07/15/12 ( 12)
- RE: Wrong. - josh358 17:07:03 07/18/12 ( 3)
- RE: Wrong. - Paully 17:39:27 07/18/12 ( 2)
- RE: Wrong. - josh358 17:51:36 07/18/12 ( 1)
- Right - tmsorosk 17:53:11 07/18/12 ( 0)
- RE: Wrong. - middleground 11:31:55 07/16/12 ( 0)
- Methinks you misunderstood Kal's comments - willkayakforfood 11:19:18 07/15/12 ( 6)
- And music from a 2-channel system also has reflected sound; engineers realize this (good ones) and so create. - tinear 16:05:10 07/15/12 ( 1)
- But it comes at you from the wrong direction! (nt) - Kal Rubinson 17:53:59 07/15/12 ( 0)
- RE: Methinks you misunderstood Kal's comments - Pally 13:35:16 07/15/12 ( 0)
Yup. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 12:58:40 07/15/12 ( 0)
Ambisonic encoding / recording may get much closer to correct surround recording. Interesting link, - cfb 12:28:21 07/15/12 ( 1)
- Perhaps. - Kal Rubinson 13:00:56 07/15/12 ( 0)
RE: fine for movies - middleground 06:42:53 07/15/12 ( 0)
I think it's the material - Frihed89 00:42:07 07/15/12 ( 4)
- not like Star Wars - pbarach 13:31:30 07/18/12 ( 1)
- RE: not like Star Wars - Raymond Leggs 14:57:05 07/18/12 ( 0)
RE: I think it's the material - abs1 04:33:27 07/15/12 ( 1)
- Nice. - Kal Rubinson 08:45:45 07/15/12 ( 0)
Different mind sets. - Teresa 23:32:29 07/14/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - russ69 22:51:43 07/14/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - Iron Knee 22:29:03 07/14/12 ( 0)
[Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]
