 
|
General Asylum: RE: Wrong. by Paully General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
General Asylum: RE: Wrong. by Paully General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
For Sale Ads |
174.53.78.114
In Reply to: Wrong. posted by Kal Rubinson on July 15, 2012 at 07:48:14:
I have never been to an event where they had speakers in the back of a room so the band was playing in surround. Nor have I ever been to a symphony where they made sure to have a second orchestra playing in the back either. All concerts I have been to had the music coming from the front and any "surround" was purely reflective. Don't get me wrong, if you find surround to be a more realistic presentation and it trips your musical trigger, I say fantastic. I, on the other hand, have always found two channel stereo sufficient and surround to be distracting.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Why is surround sound not "high end"? - Raymond Leggs 21:27:41 07/14/12 ( 67)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 10:02:46 07/18/12 ( 3)
- RE: Why surround sound is not "high end?" - Sumflow 23:55:15 07/20/12 ( 2)
- RE: Why surround sound is not "high end?" - Raymond Leggs 15:09:53 07/21/12 ( 1)
- RE: Why surround sound is not "high end?" - Raymond Leggs 15:16:47 07/21/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - hahax@verizon.net 21:19:08 07/15/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 12:21:26 07/15/12 ( 12)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - josh358 17:37:42 07/18/12 ( 4)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 17:57:35 07/18/12 ( 3)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - josh358 18:15:52 07/18/12 ( 2)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 21:26:33 07/18/12 ( 1)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - josh358 06:52:29 07/19/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - 3db 04:47:56 07/18/12 ( 1)
- RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - pictureguy 09:08:57 07/18/12 ( 0)
Is there a conflict here? ;-) - Kal Rubinson 13:03:42 07/15/12 ( 4)
- LOL !! - AbeCollins 13:32:27 07/15/12 ( 3)
- RE: LOL !! - pictureguy 18:42:22 07/15/12 ( 2)
- Too much information. It was just a jab. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 07:17:57 07/16/12 ( 1)
- RE: Too much information. It was just a jab. (NT) - pictureguy 08:11:45 07/16/12 ( 0)
For me, multichannel is better than stereo - Tubo 10:23:25 07/15/12 ( 2)
- Now that's a convincing argument - Craiger56 20:48:16 07/15/12 ( 1)
- RE: Now that's a convincing argument - middleground 09:49:49 07/17/12 ( 0)
Says who? - mark111 09:50:18 07/15/12 ( 0)
I spent a lot on a surround system.. Just not as much as on my two channel - Elizabeth 09:16:33 07/15/12 ( 16)
- Elizabeth which Bryston do you have? nt - theob 09:38:25 07/15/12 ( 15)
- Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Elizabeth 10:18:50 07/15/12 ( 14)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 12:57:20 07/15/12 ( 0)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 12:12:53 07/15/12 ( 12)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Raymond Leggs 12:31:54 07/15/12 ( 4)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - abs1 13:41:45 07/15/12 ( 3)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - tmsorosk 15:05:06 07/15/12 ( 2)
- Sometimes the used bargain is a great relief from over the top high prices.. - Elizabeth 15:54:30 07/15/12 ( 1)
- RE: Sometimes the used bargain is a great relief from over the top high prices.. - Raymond Leggs 16:01:45 07/15/12 ( 0)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 12:28:14 07/15/12 ( 6)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Dawnrazor 22:46:57 07/15/12 ( 3)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 05:44:44 07/16/12 ( 2)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - Dawnrazor 21:23:58 07/18/12 ( 1)
- RE: Bryston BP-26 and 1.5 phono, plus Bryston 4B-SST2 nt - theob 05:58:16 07/19/12 ( 0)
- RI bought the DEQ2496 on a whim and have never really explored it's capabilities, i do use it pass through - Elizabeth 13:49:41 07/15/12 ( 1)
- RE: RI bought the DEQ2496 on a whim and have never really explored it's capabilities, i do use it pass through - theob 15:11:50 07/15/12 ( 0)
Space and Pride - genungo 08:37:48 07/15/12 ( 0)
You are too concerned with labels. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 07:49:26 07/15/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - middleground 06:47:49 07/15/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - middleground 06:42:15 07/15/12 ( 0)
fine for movies - tmsorosk 05:57:37 07/15/12 ( 15)
- Wrong. - Kal Rubinson 07:48:14 07/15/12 ( 13)
- RE: Wrong. - Paully 07/15/12 10:47:54 07/15/12 ( 12)
- RE: Wrong. - josh358 17:07:03 07/18/12 ( 3)
- RE: Wrong. - Paully 17:39:27 07/18/12 ( 2)
- RE: Wrong. - josh358 17:51:36 07/18/12 ( 1)
- Right - tmsorosk 17:53:11 07/18/12 ( 0)
- RE: Wrong. - middleground 11:31:55 07/16/12 ( 0)
- Methinks you misunderstood Kal's comments - willkayakforfood 11:19:18 07/15/12 ( 6)
- And music from a 2-channel system also has reflected sound; engineers realize this (good ones) and so create. - tinear 16:05:10 07/15/12 ( 1)
- But it comes at you from the wrong direction! (nt) - Kal Rubinson 17:53:59 07/15/12 ( 0)
- RE: Methinks you misunderstood Kal's comments - Pally 13:35:16 07/15/12 ( 0)
Yup. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 12:58:40 07/15/12 ( 0)
Ambisonic encoding / recording may get much closer to correct surround recording. Interesting link, - cfb 12:28:21 07/15/12 ( 1)
- Perhaps. - Kal Rubinson 13:00:56 07/15/12 ( 0)
RE: fine for movies - middleground 06:42:53 07/15/12 ( 0)
I think it's the material - Frihed89 00:42:07 07/15/12 ( 4)
- not like Star Wars - pbarach 13:31:30 07/18/12 ( 1)
- RE: not like Star Wars - Raymond Leggs 14:57:05 07/18/12 ( 0)
RE: I think it's the material - abs1 04:33:27 07/15/12 ( 1)
- Nice. - Kal Rubinson 08:45:45 07/15/12 ( 0)
Different mind sets. - Teresa 23:32:29 07/14/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - russ69 22:51:43 07/14/12 ( 0)
RE: Why is surround sound not "high end"? - Iron Knee 22:29:03 07/14/12 ( 0)
[Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]
