|
Digital Drive: By the way, Jon L's comment below is well taken... by Tobias Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
For Sale Ads |
142.169.183.189
In Reply to: Because it was reviewed under that Review Category posted by agattu on March 29, 2004 at 10:52:25:
I really shouldn't have listed my main system in the context of this review, but the reviews page won't let you past without system details. Just as it makes you list a player as a player / recorder. I'm not complaining, I just wasn't ready for this.When I posted, the review was already written and the system details I thought were important were all in the text of the review. When I realized I'd have to list the associated stuff I just threw my main system in there (it's all in the Inmate Systems anyway) to get the posting done and go out for a walk.
On reflection, it might have made more sense if I'd listed my second system, that is, the original CD-S100 plus amp, speakers and cables. For the record :
Amp : Century 21 Alpha 120 ( I know you've never heard of it, it's Chinese, about 100 wpc solid-state and sold when available for CDN$999 )
Speakers : Aurum Cantus Leisure 2 Mk II
Cables : Van den Hul The Second and Audioquest Type 4
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - REVIEW: Shanling CD-S100 Mk II CD Player/Recorder - Tobias 07:46:46 03/28/04 ( 5)
- Why do you call it a Player/RECORDER ? nt - hh 09:45:37 03/29/04 ( 2)
- Because it was reviewed under that Review Category - agattu 10:52:25 03/29/04 ( 1)
- By the way, Jon L's comment below is well taken... - Tobias 03/29/04 17:23:56 03/29/04 ( 0)
Wait a minute - Jon L 11:52:47 03/28/04 ( 1)
- Re: Wait a minute - Tobias 14:35:57 03/28/04 ( 0)