Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Vinyl Asylum

Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

What is within the phono signal in terms of transfer function

Posted by Busybusy on August 13, 2003 at 08:58:26:

Hi,
As the phono signal supposedly is corrupted with crosstalk, and limited separation, what would be the transfer function that truly represent the phono signal?

Assuming ignoring the RIAA curve,

L (left output) = L + k*R ? (k is a constant)

Assuming that we know or find the k, then can't we inject a -k*R into the L signal?

L = L + k*R - k(R+k*L)=L - *k^2L, therefore, we eliminated the crosstalk and increase separation? Assuming symmetry in mechanical system (well designed hardware), then k in L and R signal should be the same.

This would be easy to incorporate into a phono stage?

Any thoughts?