Tweakers' Asylum

Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: My point is

Posted by unclestu on April 30, 2012 at 14:53:45:
that you are jumping to conclusions based on the numbers when you have yet to even try the tweak. A 6.5% lowering is significant when compared to, say, distortion figures in an amplifier, and no one quibbles about a manufacturer claiming that.

In my experience, degaussing an LP is usually of greater import than using a Zerostat. But I tried it before dismissing the idea, and later acquired a Lakeshore gaussmeter to measure what I heard.

But of course, YMMV and you are most certainly entitled to think what ever you want.

Stu